Does the presence of a specialized rehabilitation unit in a veterans affairs facility impact referral for rehabilitative care after a lower-extremity amputation?

Does the presence of a specialized rehabilitation unit in a veterans affairs facility impact referral for rehabilitative care after a lower-extremity amputation?
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.018
复制
发表时间:
2007-10-01
影响因子:
4.3
通讯作者:
Stineman, Margaret G.
Stineman, Margaret G.
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bates, Barbara E.;Kurichi, Jibby E.;Stineman, Margaret G.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:为了确定是否存在专门的康复单位(SRUs)内退伍军人事务部医疗中心(VAMC)影响获得康复services.Design:回顾性队列analysis.Setting:两种类型的VAMC:那些有和没有SRUs.Participants:退伍军人下肢截肢出院VAMC之间2002年10月1日,2003年9月30日。共有2375名退伍军人截肢:99%是男性; 60%是经胫骨截肢,40%是经股骨截肢,不到1%是髋关节离断截肢。966名患者(41%)在VAMC与SRU一起就诊。干预措施:不适用。主要结果测量:提供的服务水平表示为:住院期间没有康复证据,仅通过咨询进行一般康复,或入住SRU。结果:在有SRU床位的机构治疗的患者和在没有SRU床位的机构治疗的患者在年龄、性别、婚姻状况、入院来源或截肢水平(均P
Objective: To determine if the presence of specialized rehabilitation units (SRUs) within Veterans Affairs medical centers (VAMC) influences access to rehabilitation services.Design: Retrospective cohort analysis.Setting: Two types of VAMCs: those with and without SRUs.Participants: Veterans with lower-extremity amputations discharged from VAMCs between October 1, 2002, and September 30, 2003. There were a total of 2375 veterans with amputations: 99% were men; and 60% had transtibial, 40% had transfemoral, and less than 1% had hip disarticulation amputations. Nine hundred sixty-six patients (41%) were seen at a VAMC with an SRU.Interventions: Not applicable.Main Outcome Measure: Level of service provided expressed as: no evidence of rehabilitation during the hospitalization, generalized rehabilitation through consultation only, or admission to an SRU.Results: There were no differences between patients treated at facilities with SRUs and those treated in a facility without SRU beds with respect to age, sex, marital status, source of hospital admission, or level of amputation (all P