Brief assessment of severe language impairments: Initial validation of the Mississippi aphasia screening test
Brief assessment of severe language impairments: Initial validation of the Mississippi aphasia screening test
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/02699050400025331
复制
发表时间：
2005-08-01
期刊：
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
Vickery, C
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Nakase-Thompson, R;Manning, E;Vickery, C
主要目标：为了验证密西西比失语症筛查测试（MAST），其中包括9个分量表测量表达和接受语言能力。研究设计：住院患者入院神经科，神经外科或康复单位在两个当地医院和谁是在60天内发生单侧缺血性或出血性中风（左半球（LH; n = 38）;右半球（RH; n = 20））的评价。从社区招募额外的参与者组成非患者对照样本（NP; n = 36）.方法：数据收集包括MAST管理和图表review.Results：LH组显示更多的损害比RH和NP组的综合评分。LH组在所有子量表上的表现均劣于NP组。对象识别和语言流畅性分量表没有歧视中风groups.Conclusion：分析表明良好的标准效度MAST在区分临床和对照样本之间的沟通障碍。
Primary objective: To validate the Mississippi Aphasia Screening Test (MAST) which includes nine sub-scales measuring expressive and receptive language abilities.Research design: Evaluation of inpatients admitted to neurology, neurosurgery or rehabilitation units at two local hospitals and who were within 60 days of onset of a unilateral ischemic or haemorrhagic stroke (left hemisphere (LH; n = 38); right hemisphere (RH; n = 20)). Additional participants were recruited from the community to comprise a non- patient control sample (NP; n = 36).Methods: Data collection included administration of the MAST and chart review.Results: The LH group showed more impairment than the RH and NP groups on summary scores. The LH group performed worse than the NP group on all sub-scales. The object recognition and verbal fluency sub-scales did not discriminate the stroke groups.Conclusion: Analyses suggest good criterion validity for the MAST in differentiating communication impairments among clinical and control samples.