The selective disruption of spatial working memory by eye movements

The selective disruption of spatial working memory by eye movements
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/17470210500151410
复制
发表时间:
2006-01-01
影响因子:
1.7
通讯作者:
Baddeley, AD
Baddeley, AD
中科院分区:
心理学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Postle, BR;Idzikowski, C;Baddeley, AD

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在20世纪70年代末/ 80年代初,巴德利和他的同事们进行了一系列实验,研究眼球运动在视觉工作记忆中的作用。尽管这些研究只在一本书中作了简要的描述(Baddeley, 1986),但这些研究已经影响了从实验心理学到人类神经心理学再到非人类灵长类动物电生理学等领域的大量经验和理论发展。本文详细介绍了该系列中的三项重要研究,以及最近进行的一项研究,该研究包括眼动测量和控制水平,这在以前的研究中是不可用的。总之,这些结果证明了视觉空间工作记忆对眼球运动的敏感性。首先,产生破坏性效果的是眼球运动控制,而不是运动本身。其次,这些影响仅限于对位置的工作记忆,而不会推广到对形状的视觉工作记忆。第三,它们可以被隔离到工作记忆的存储/维护部分(例如,延迟识别任务的延迟期)。这些事实对视觉工作记忆模型具有重要意义。
In the late 1970s/early 1980s, Baddeley and colleagues conducted a series of experiments investigating the role of eye movements in visual working memory. Although only described briefly in a book (Baddeley, 1986), these studies have influenced a remarkable number of empirical and theoretical developments in fields ranging from experimental psychology to human neuropsychology to nonhuman primate electrophysiology. This paper presents, in full detail, three critical studies from this series, together with a recently performed study that includes a level of eye movement measurement and control that was not available for the older studies. Together, the results demonstrate several facts about the sensitivity of visuospatial working memory to eye movements. First, it is eye movement control, not movement per se, that produces the disruptive effects. Second, these effects are limited to working memory for locations and do not generalize to visual working memory for shapes. Third, they can be isolated to the storage/maintenance components of working memory (e. g., to the delay period of the delayed-recognition task). These facts have important implications for models of visual working memory.