English and Japanese Resultatives Resultative Constructions vs. Lexical Resultatives
English and Japanese Resultatives Resultative Constructions vs. Lexical Resultatives
复制标题
英语和日语结果结果 结果结构与词汇结果结果
DOI：
10.11114/ijecs.v5i1.5560
复制
发表时间：
2022
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Hideki Hamamoto
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hougham;D.;Clenton;J.;Uchihara;T.;Higginbotham;G;Hideki Hamamoto
描述一个动作导致一个结果的语言表达被称为结果表达或结果表达。在结果结构中，那些以结构为基础的结构是结果结构。英语动结式被认为是一个从核心格到外围和惯用格的结构家族。另一方面，与通常的看法相反，日语缺乏明确的结果结构。它的动结式仅限于假动结式和动结式动词复合词。结果表达式有两种类型：一种是因果关系来自结构，另一种是因果关系来自单词。英语有这两个结果，而日语只有后者。换句话说，从CAUSE所代表的因果关系的来源来看，结果句可以分为CAUSE来源于词汇的结果句和CAUSE来源于结构的结果句。英语有两种类型，而日语只有词汇起源的因果关系。本文详细探讨了这一问题。
Linguistic expressions describing a situation where an action brings about a result are called resultative expressions or resultatives. Of resultatives, those based on construction are resultative constructions. English resultative constructions are considered a family extending from core cases to peripheral and idiomatic instances. On the other hand, contrary to ordinary opinions, the Japanese language lacks explicit resultative constructions. Its resultative expressions are limited to pseudo-resultatives and resultative verbal compounds. Resultative expressions can be of two types; those whose causal relation derives from construction and those whose causal relation derives from a word. English has these two resultatives, but Japanese has only the latter. In other words, when viewed from the origin of where the causal relationship represented by CAUSE comes from, resultatives can be divided into those whose CAUSE originates lexically and those whose CAUSE originates from the construction. English has both types, while Japanese has only the lexically originated causal relationship. This paper examines this issue in detail.