How Should Clinicians Determine a Traumatized Patient's Readiness to Return to Work?

How Should Clinicians Determine a Traumatized Patient's Readiness to Return to Work?
复制标题

DOI:
10.1001/amajethics.2022.111
复制
发表时间:
2022-02-01
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Javanbakht A
Javanbakht A
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Moses TEH;Javanbakht A

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

临床医生的标准主要角色是治疗和监测患者的健康状况并成为他们的盟友。然而,对患者和组织负有义务的临床医生还必须评估患者的非治疗目的(例如,恢复工作的准备情况)。这两项义务可能会发生冲突,当发生冲突时,临床医生必须平衡他们对患者和社会的责任。我们提出了临床医生在确定患者是否准备好重返工作岗位时应考虑的标准,并就解释影响这一决定的因素提供了建议。
A clinician’s standard primary role is to treat and monitor their patients’ health and to be their ally. Clinicians with obligations to patients and to organizations, however, must also assess patients for nontherapeutic purposes (eg, readiness to resume work). These 2 obligations can conflict, and, when they do, clinicians must balance their duties to patients and to society. We propose criteria clinicians should consider when determining a patient’s readiness to return to work and offer recommendations for interpreting factors that influence this decision.