Will the Kraepelinian dichotomy survive DSM-V?

Will the Kraepelinian dichotomy survive DSM-V?
复制标题

DOI:
10.1038/npp.2009.32
复制
发表时间:
2009-08
期刊:
Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
--
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

Kraepelin提出早发性痴呆和躁狂抑郁症是两种主要的精神障碍。这种模式仍然很普遍,但双相情感障碍和精神分裂症之间的重叠界限的观察挑战了这种二分法。然而,精神分裂症的概念已经从最初的Kraepelinian提议中彻底改变。我们为两种精神病的立场辩护,但提出启发式应用中的两个缺陷:1)重叠的特征,如精神病性症状,在鉴别诊断中不是决定性的; 2)每种障碍都是一种综合征,而不是一种疾病实体。基于病理学领域的另一种范式对于病因学、病理生理学和治疗发现的研究更有力。
Kraepelin proposed dementia praecox and manic-depressive illness as the two major psychotic disorders. This paradigm is still prevalent, but observations of overlapping boundaries between bipolar disorder and schizophrenia challenge this dichotomy. However, the concept of schizophrenia has been radically altered from the original Kraepelinian proposal. We defend the two psychoses position, but suggest two flaws in the heuristic application: 1) overlapping features such as psychotic symptoms are not decisive in differential diagnosis; and 2) each disorder is a syndrome, not a disease entity. An alternative paradigm based on domains of pathology is more powerful for studies of etiology, pathophysiology, and therapeutic discovery.
DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbl049
发表时间: 2007-01-01
影响因子: 6.6
作者:
Braff, David L.;Freedman, Robert;Gottesman, Irving I.
通讯作者: Gottesman, Irving I.
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(98)00321-7
发表时间: 1999-03-01
影响因子: 10.6
作者:
Freedman, R;Adler, LE;Leonard, S
通讯作者: Leonard, S
DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbl044
发表时间: 2007-01-01
影响因子: 6.6
作者:
Calkins, Monica E.;Dobie, Dorcas J.;Braff, David L.
通讯作者: Braff, David L.
DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbm059
发表时间: 2007-07-01
影响因子: 6.6
作者:
Dutta, Rina;Greene, Talya;Murray, Robin M.
通讯作者: Murray, Robin M.
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291706007902
发表时间: 2006-08-01
影响因子: 6.9
作者:
Glahn, David C.;Barrett, Jennifer;Velligan, Dawn I.
通讯作者: Velligan, Dawn I.