Investigating proficiency using a lift-type transfer support device for effective care: comparison of skilled and unskilled nursing homes.

Investigating proficiency using a lift-type transfer support device for effective care: comparison of skilled and unskilled nursing homes.
复制标题

调查使用升降式转移支持装置进行有效护理的熟练程度:熟练和非熟练疗养院的比较。

DOI:
10.1080/17483107.2022.2128444
复制
发表时间:
2022
期刊:
Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology.
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Kondo I.
Kondo I.
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Yoshimi T;Kato K;Tsuchimoto S;Mizuguchi N;Aimoto K;Itoh N;Kondo I.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

目的本研究的目的是探讨持续使用“拥抱”型机器人转运支持设备“Hug”是否可以提高护理质量水平。方法从转运所花费的时间、使用该设备的转运比例以及目标范围等方面考察熟练程度对使用该设备的影响。对使用该设备超过 24 个月的熟练护理机构和非熟练机构的结果进行了比较。结果非熟练机构的转移时间为 4.6 分钟(引入后第 2 周),减少到 3.0 分钟(第 5 周),熟练机构为 1.5 分钟。非熟练设施的使用率为 13% 和 30%(分别为第 2 周和第 5 周),而熟练设施的使用率为 97%。此外,我们在技术设施中确定了更广泛的目标护理对象。结论掌握 Hug 的使用需要时间;然而,它的使用有许多积极的方面,特别是从护理接受者的角度来看,例如更好的护理、使用自己的腿以及减少转移时间。这些研究结果表明,广泛使用 Hug 将提高护理质量。 对康复的影响 使用 Hug 的护理人员身体负担减轻,他们可以与护理接受者交谈。 在转移过程中使用接受者自己的腿,可以防止腿部肌肉废用。 由于转移时间减少,接受者将有更多的下床机会。
PurposeThe purpose of the study was to investigate whether the sustained use of the "Hug," a "hugging" type robotic transfer support device, could increase the level of quality of care.MethodsThe effect of proficiency on using the device was examined in terms of time spent for transfer, ratio of transfers using the device, and range of targets. The results were compared between skilled care facilities that had used the device for >24 months and unskilled facilities.ResultsThe time spent for transfer at the unskilled facility was 4.6 min (2nd week after introduction), was reduced to 3.0 min (5th week), and 1.5 min at the skilled facility. The usage ratio at the unskilled facility was 13% and 30% (2nd and 5th week, respectively), while it was 97% in the skilled facility. Further, we identified wider in the range of target care recipients in the skilled facility.ConclusionIt takes time to master the use of Hug; however, its use was associated with many positive aspects, especially from the perspective of care recipients, e.g., better care, use of their own legs, and reduced time for transfers. These findings suggest that the widespread use of Hug would improve the quality of care.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONLess physically burdened on the caregivers using Hug, they can afford to talk to the care recipients.Using recipient’s own legs during transfers, it prevents leg muscle disuse.As reduced time for transfers, recipients will have more opportunities to get out of bed.
DOI: 10.1136/oem.2010.055939
发表时间: 2011-09
影响因子: 4.9
作者:
Koppelaar E;Knibbe JJ;Miedema HS;Burdorf A
通讯作者: Burdorf A
DOI: 10.5365/wpsar.2011.2.4.008
发表时间: 2011
期刊: Western Pacific surveillance and response journal : WPSAR
影响因子: --
作者:
Tomoya Saito;Ayano Kunimitsu
通讯作者: Ayano Kunimitsu
DOI: 10.31616/asj.2019.0111
发表时间: 2021-03
影响因子: 2.3
作者:
Miura K;Kadone H;Abe T;Koda M;Funayama T;Noguchi H;Kumagai H;Nagashima K;Mataki K;Shibao Y;Sato K;Kawamoto H;Sankai Y;Yamazaki M
通讯作者: Yamazaki M
DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2022.2039324
发表时间: 2022-03-12
影响因子: 1.8
作者:
Kato, Kenji;Yoshimi, Tatsuya;Kondo, Izumi
通讯作者: Kondo, Izumi
DOI: 10.1037/0022-006x.73.5.852
发表时间: 2005-10-01
影响因子: 5.9
作者:
Borrelli, B;Sepinwall, D;Orwig, D
通讯作者: Orwig, D