Evaluating Alignment Between Curriculum, Assessment, and Instruction
Evaluating Alignment Between Curriculum, Assessment, and Instruction
复制标题
DOI：
10.3102/0034654309341375
复制
发表时间：
2009-12-01
影响因子：
11.2
通讯作者：
Sireci, Stephen G.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Martone, Andrea;Sireci, Stephen G.
作者（a）讨论了调整的重要性，以促进适当的评估和指导，（B）描述了三种最常见的方法，用于评估国家内容标准和评估之间的调整，（c）讨论这些方法的相对优势和局限性，（d）讨论每种方法的应用实例。他们的结论是，调整方法的选择取决于州或地区的具体目标，调整研究对于确保标准评估教学周期促进学生学习至关重要。校准研究的其他潜在好处包括教师宝贵的专业发展和更好地理解标准化评估的结果。
The authors (a) discuss the importance of alignment for facilitating proper assessment and instruction, (b) describe the three most common methods for evaluating the alignment between state content standards and assessments, (c) discuss the relative strengths and limitations of these methods, and (d) discuss examples of applications of each method. They conclude that choice of alignment method depends on the specific goals of a state or district and that alignment research is critical for ensuring the standards-assessment-instruction cycle facilitates student learning. Additional potential benefits of alignment research include valuable professional development for teachers and better understanding of the results from standardized assessments.