Intersubjectivity and Bourdieusian Approaches to 'Identity'
Intersubjectivity and Bourdieusian Approaches to 'Identity'
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/1749975509356750
复制
发表时间：
2010-03-01
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
Bottero, Wendy
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bottero, Wendy
布迪厄强调惯习的社会化主体性，这一点在讨论“身份”时越来越多地被用来指出反身性的局限性，将“身份”置于默会实践中。在强调“同一性”的倾向性时，分析家也承认更明确的反身性和自我意识动员的方面;然而，布迪厄对反身性的限制性处理使得很难将这些不同方面之间的关系理论化。“反身性问题”更恰当地说是实践的主体间性问题，而“同一性”的不同方面更好地理论化为情境主体间性的特征。通过实践，主体间协调的协商结果，然后“从群体中发出命令”，对行为的日常监督，代理人对其活动的反思性描述，以及代理人动员到集体中，可以作为实践集体成就的特征进行探索，通过各种处置代理人的网络，其行动，尽管是处置的，但仍然必须被解释和调整。
Bourdieu's emphasis on the socialized subjectivity of habitus is increasingly used in discussions of 'identity' to indicate the limits to reflexivity, situating 'identity' in tacit practice. In emphasizing the dispositional nature of 'identity', analysts also acknowledge more explicitly reflexive and self-consciously mobilized aspects; however, Bourdieu's restrictive treatment of reflexivity makes it difficult to theorize the relations between these different aspects. The 'problem of reflexivity' is more properly a question of the intersubjective nature of practice, and the different aspects of 'identity' are better theorized as features of situated intersubjectivity. With practice the negotiated outcome of intersubjective coordination, then 'calls to order from the group', the routine monitoring of conduct, agents' reflexive accounts of their activity, and the mobilization of agents into collectivities can be explored as features of the collective accomplishment of practices, by networks of variously disposed agents, whose actions, whilst dispositional, must nonetheless be accounted for and aligned.