Identifying individuals with opioid use disorder: Validity of International Classification of Diseases diagnostic codes for opioid use, dependence and abuse.

Identifying individuals with opioid use disorder: Validity of International Classification of Diseases diagnostic codes for opioid use, dependence and abuse.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108583
复制
发表时间:
2021-04-01
影响因子:
4.2
通讯作者:
Lin LA
Lin LA
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lagisetty P;Garpestad C;Larkin A;Macleod C;Antoku D;Slat S;Thomas J;Powell V;Bohnert ASB;Lin LA

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

政策评价和卫生系统干预措施经常利用国际疾病分类(ICD)阿片类药物使用、依赖和滥用代码来识别阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者,并评估接受循证治疗。然而,ICD代码可能不会直接映射到精神疾病诊断和统计手册(DSM-5)OUD标准。本研究旨在探讨ICD编码在识别OUD患者中的阳性预测价值。我们对2012至2017年间因阿片类药物使用、依赖或滥用而被分配ICD-9或ICD-10代码的520名退伍军人进行了临床图表审查。我们从前一个月和最初的ICD代码列出后三个月的临床文献中提取了DSM-5 OUD标准和阿片类药物滥用的证据,并将患者归类为:1)OUD的高可能性,2)有限的异常阿片类药物使用,3)在没有异常使用证据的情况下处方阿片类药物使用,以及4)信息不足。阳性预测值被计算为具有这些ICD代码的个体在复查图表时符合OUD标准的高可能性的百分比。仅57.7%的患者被归类为OUD的高可能性;16.5%的患者被归类为有限的异常阿片类药物使用,18.9%的患者在没有异常使用证据的情况下使用处方阿片类药物,6.9%的患者信息不足。被分配了阿片类药物使用、依赖或滥用的ICD代码的患者通常缺乏符合OUD标准的文件。许多人接受了长期的阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛,但没有滥用的证据。确定OUD患者的可靠方法对于改善获得临床适当治疗的机会至关重要。
Policy evaluations and health system interventions often utilize International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes of opioid use, dependence, and abuse to identify individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) and assess receipt of evidence-based treatments. However, ICD codes may not map directly onto the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder (DSM-5) OUD criteria. This study investigates the positive predictive value of ICD codes in identifying patients with OUD. We conducted a clinical chart review on a national sample of 520 Veterans assigned ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes for opioid use, dependence, or abuse from 2012 to 2017. We extracted evidence of DSM-5 OUD criteria and opioid misuse from clinical documentation in the month preceding and three months following initial ICD code listing, and categorized patients into: 1) high likelihood of OUD, 2) limited aberrant opioid use, 3) prescribed opioid use without evidence of aberrant use, and 4) insufficient information. Positive predictive value was calculated as the percentage of individuals with these ICD codes meeting high likelihood of OUD criteria upon chart review. Only 57.7 % of patients were categorized as high likelihood of OUD; 16.5 % were categorized as limited aberrant opioid use, 18.9 % prescribed opioid use without evidence of aberrant use, and 6.9 % insufficient information. Patients assigned ICD codes for opioid use, dependence, or abuse often lack documentation of meeting OUD criteria. Many receive long-term opioid therapy for chronic pain without evidence of misuse. Robust methods of identifying individuals with OUD are crucial to improving access to clinically appropriate treatment.
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.02.014
发表时间: 2016-07-01
影响因子: 5.9
作者:
Ciesielski, Thomas;Iyengar, Reethi;Gage, Brian F.
通讯作者: Gage, Brian F.
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.03.010
发表时间: 2007-10-08
影响因子: 4.2
作者:
Gordon, Adam J.;Trafton, Jodie A.;Liberto, Joseph
通讯作者: Liberto, Joseph
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-017-4288-3
发表时间: 2018-10-01
影响因子: 5.7
作者:
Glanz, Jason M.;Narwaney, Komal J.;Binswanger, Ingrid A.
通讯作者: Binswanger, Ingrid A.
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-017-4283-8
发表时间: 2018-06-01
影响因子: 5.7
作者:
Hadlandsmyth, Katherine;Mosher, Hilary;Lund, Brian C.
通讯作者: Lund, Brian C.
DOI: 10.1086/503631
发表时间: 2006-05-01
影响因子: 9.8
作者:
Gelernter, J;Panhuysen, C;Kranzler, HR
通讯作者: Kranzler, HR