Critical Infrastructure Protection XII - 12th IFIP WG 11.10 International Conference, ICCIP 2018, Arlington, VA, USA, March 12-14, 2018, Revised Selected Papers
Critical Infrastructure Protection XII - 12th IFIP WG 11.10 International Conference, ICCIP 2018, Arlington, VA, USA, March 12-14, 2018, Revised Selected Papers
复制标题
关键基础设施保护 XII - 第 12 届 IFIP WG 11.10 国际会议，ICCIP 2018，美国弗吉尼亚州阿灵顿，2018 年 3 月 12-14 日，修订选定论文
DOI：
10.1007/978-3-030-04537-1_2
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Hussain A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hussain A
支撑一个国家应对网络安全政策挑战能力的一个关键因素是支持决策的证据质量。作为这一进程的一部分，政策顾问基本上是一个多元化的群体，包括从公务员到当选的决策者的每一个人，他们必须评估来自各种来源的证据。在时间紧迫的情况下，相关专业知识有限或不可用，根据官方简报，学术来源和行业威胁报告评估威胁，风险和相称的反应可能非常具有挑战性。本章提出了一个评估决策中使用的证据质量的模型。该模型的效用说明使用一个样本的证据来源，它演示了如何不同的属性可以用于比较证据质量。最终目标是帮助解决潜在的冲突，并以系统的方式权衡调查结果和意见。
A key factor underpinning a state’s capacity to respond to cyber security policy challenges is the quality of evidence that supports decision making. As part of this process, policy advisers, essentially a diverse group that includes everyone from civil servants to elected policy makers, are required to assess evidence from a mix of sources. In time-critical scenarios where relevant expertise is limited or not available, assessing threats, risk and proportionate response based on official briefings, academic sources and industry threat reports can be very challenging. This chapter presents a model for assessing the quality of evidence used in policymaking. The utility of the model is illustrated using a sample of evidence sources and it is demonstrated how different attributes may be used for comparing evidence quality. The ultimate goal is to help resolve potential conflicts and weigh findings and opinions in a systematic manner.