Truth or consequences: the validity of self-report data in health services research on addictions.
Truth or consequences: the validity of self-report data in health services research on addictions.
复制标题
真相或后果：卫生服务成瘾研究中自我报告数据的有效性。
DOI：
10.1080/09652140020004278
复制
发表时间：
2000
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Noll,JA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
DelBoca,FK;Noll,JA
本文探讨了影响卫生服务研究中口头自我报告数据准确性的因素，使用数据收集过程的认知社会心理模型作为组织框架。它首先简要总结了测量误差可能导致的后果。接下来，提出了问答过程的认知社会心理模型。评价了关于具体评估方法效用的共同假设，特别强调了替代数据来源的优缺点。然后，该框架专门用于了解可能影响与酒精和其他物质使用有关的卫生服务研究中自我报告措施的因素。总体而言，当条件设计为最大限度地提高响应准确性时，自我报告程序可以提供有用的临床环境消耗估计值。
This paper examines factors that influence the veracity of verbal self‐report data in health services research, using a cognitive social‐psychological model of the data‐gathering process as an organizing framework. It begins by briefly summarizing the consequences that can result from measurement error. Next, a cognitive social‐psychological model of the question‐answering process is presented. Common assumptions regarding the utility of specific assessment methods are evaluated with particular emphasis on the strengths and weaknesses of alternative data sources. The framework is then applied specifically to understanding the factors that may affect self‐report measures in health services research relating to alcohol and other substance use. Overall, self‐report procedures can provide useful estimates of consumption in clinical settings when conditions are designed to maximize response accuracy.