Experimental assessment of polynomial nonlinear state-space and nonlinear-mode models for near-resonant vibrations
Experimental assessment of polynomial nonlinear state-space and nonlinear-mode models for near-resonant vibrations
复制标题
近共振多项式非线性状态空间和非线性模式模型的实验评估
DOI:
10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106796
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
M. Krack
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Scheel;Gleb Kleyman;A. Tatar;M. Brake;S. Peter;J. Noël;M. Allen;M. Krack
In the present paper, two existing nonlinear system identification methodologies are used to identify data-driven models. The first methodology focuses on identifying the system using steady-state excitations. To accomplish this, a phase-locked loop controller is implemented to acquire periodic oscillations near resonance and construct a nonlinear-mode model. This model is based on amplitude-dependent modal properties, i.e. does not require nonlinear basis functions. The second methodology exploits uncontrolled experiments with broadband random inputs to build polynomial nonlinear state-space models using advanced system identification tools. The methods are applied to two experimental test rigs, a magnetic cantilever beam and a free-free beam with a lap joint. The respective models obtained by either method for both specimens are then challenged to predict dynamic, near-resonant behavior observed under different sine and sine-sweep excitations. The vibration prediction of the nonlinear-mode and state-space models clearly highlight capabilities and limitations. The nonlinear-mode model, by design, yields a perfect match at resonance peaks and high accuracy in close vicinity. However, it is limited to well-spaced modes and sinusoidal excitation. The state-space model covers a wider dynamic range, including transient excitations. However, the real-life nonlinearities considered in this study can only be approximated by polynomial basis functions. Consequently, the identified state-space models are found to be highly input-dependent, in particular for sinusoidal excitations where they are found to lead to a low predictive capability.
影响因子:
4.7
作者:
L. Renson;A. Gonzalez-Buelga;D. Barton;S. Neild
通讯作者:
L. Renson;A. Gonzalez-Buelga;D. Barton;S. Neild
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
Barton, David A. W.;Mann, Brian P.;Burrow, Stephen G.
通讯作者:
Burrow, Stephen G.
影响因子:
8.4
作者:
Balaji, Nidish Narayanaa;Chen, Wei;Brake, Matthew R. W.
通讯作者:
Brake, Matthew R. W.