Situational Crime Prevention and Its Discontents: Rational Choice and Harm Reduction versus 'Cultural Criminology'
Situational Crime Prevention and Its Discontents: Rational Choice and Harm Reduction versus 'Cultural Criminology'
复制标题
情景犯罪预防及其不满：理性选择和减少伤害与“文化犯罪学”
DOI：
10.1111/j.1467-9515.2009.00699.x
复制
发表时间：
2010
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Farrell G
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Farrell G
2007 年，基思·海沃德 (Keith Hayward) 在这本杂志中批评了情景犯罪预防 (SCP) 和理性选择。主要论点是SCP无法解决愤怒、敌意和兴奋等表现性犯罪。第二个论点是，这是因为理性选择的观点无法解释罪犯决策的无形方面。海沃德的文化犯罪学被认为可以更好地解释表现性犯罪和其他犯罪。本文表明根本问题可能被忽视了。概述了 SCP 适用于表现性和非理性犯罪的多种方式，以及它们如何容易地融入选择框架，并对海沃德的文化犯罪学进行了初步批评。
In this journal, in 2007, Keith Hayward criticized situational crime prevention (SCP) and rational choice. The main thesis was that SCP cannot tackle expressive crimes of anger, hostility and excitement. The secondary thesis was that this was because the rational choice perspective cannot account for intangible aspects of offender decision-making. Hayward's cultural criminology was offered as better explaining expressive and other crimes. The present article suggests fundamental issues may have been overlooked. Some of the many ways SCP applies to expressive and irrational crimes, and how readily they fit into the choice framework, are outlined, and a preliminary critique of Hayward's cultural criminology is offered.