VALIDATION OF THE CLANCE IMPOSTOR PHENOMENON SCALE

VALIDATION OF THE CLANCE IMPOSTOR PHENOMENON SCALE
复制标题

DOI:
10.1207/s15327752jpa6503_6
复制
发表时间:
1995-12-01
影响因子:
3.4
通讯作者:
GLICKAUFHUGHES, C
GLICKAUFHUGHES, C
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
CHRISMAN, SM;PIEPER, WA;GLICKAUFHUGHES, C

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

将Glance冒名顶替现象量表(GIPS; Glance,1985)与新开发的感知欺诈量表(Kolligian & Stemberg,1991)进行比较。这两个尺度被发现有很高的内部一致性,并以类似的方式与其他措施相关。此外,通过比较CIPS与抑郁、自尊、社交焦虑和自我监控的测量结果,提供了冒名顶替者现象(IF)的判别效度证据。IP与这些构建体相关,但基本上可区分。最后,通过主成分分析,产生了三个稳定的因素:假,折扣,和运气的CIPS的结构效度证据。
The Glance Impostor Phenomenon Scale (GIPS; Glance, 1985) was compared to the newly developed Perceived Fraudulence Scale (Kolligian & Stemberg, 1991). The two scales were found to have high internal consistency and to correlate in a similar manner with other measures. Further, discriminant validity evidence for the Impostor Phenomenon (IF) was provided by comparing the CIPS to measures of depression, self-esteem, social anxiety, and self-monitoring. The IP was related to, but substantially discriminable from, these constructs. Finally, construct validity evidence for the CIPS was provided through principal components analysis that yielded three stable factors: Fake, Discount, and Luck.