Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres.

Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.cmi.2020.11.004
复制
发表时间:
2021-03
期刊:
Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Navarro D
Navarro D
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Albert E;Torres I;Bueno F;Huntley D;Molla E;Fernández-Fuentes MÁ;Martínez M;Poujois S;Forqué L;Valdivia A;Solano de la Asunción C;Ferrer J;Colomina J;Navarro D

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

据我们所知,之前没有研究评估过在护理点(POC)进行的快速抗原诊断免疫测定(RAD)的性能。我们评估了Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag快速检测设备在初级医疗中心就诊的有症状患者(n = 412)中诊断2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的情况。按照制造商的说明书(在15分钟时阅读),在取样后立即进行RAD。在样本采集后24 h内进行RT-PCR。处理显示不一致结果的样品,用于在Vero E6细胞中培养。通过RT-PCR证实细胞培养物中存在严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)。在412例患者中,43例(10.4%)通过RT-PCR和RAD检测为阳性,358例(86.9%)通过两种方法检测为阴性;在11例患者(2.7%)中获得不一致的结果(RT-PCR+/RAD-)。以RT-PCR为参照,快速抗原检测(RAD)的特异性和敏感性分别为100%(95%CI 98.7-100%)和79.6%(95%CI 67.0-88.8%)。估计患病率为5%和10%的总体RAD阴性预测值分别为99%(95%CI 97.4-99.6%)和97.9%(95%CI 95.9-98.9)。不能从产生RT-PCR+/RAD-结果的标本中培养SARS-CoV-2(n = 11)。Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag快速检测仪在初级医疗中心作为早期诊断COVID-19的POC检测中表现良好。更关键的是,数据表明,经RAD检测RT-PCR证实为COVID-19阴性的患者不太可能具有传染性。
To our knowledge no previous study has assessed the performance of a rapid antigen diagnostic immunoassay (RAD) conducted at the point of care (POC). We evaluated the Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device for diagnosis of coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) in symptomatic patients (n = 412) attending primary healthcare centres. RAD was performed immediately after sampling following the manufacturer's instructions (reading at 15 min). RT-PCRs were carried out within 24 h of specimen collection. Samples displaying discordant results were processed for culture in Vero E6 cells. Presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in cell cultures was confirmed by RT-PCR. Out of 412 patients, 43 (10.4%) tested positive by RT-PCR and RAD, and 358 (86.9%) tested negative by both methods; discordant results (RT-PCR+/RAD–) were obtained in 11 patients (2.7%). Overall specificity and sensitivity of rapid antigen detection (RAD) was 100% (95%CI 98.7–100%) and 79.6% (95%CI 67.0–88.8%), respectively, taking RT-PCR as the reference. Overall RAD negative predictive value for an estimated prevalence of 5% and 10% was 99% (95%CI 97.4–99.6%) and 97.9% (95%CI 95.9–98.9), respectively. SARS-CoV-2 could not be cultured from specimens yielding RT-PCR+/RAD– results (n = 11). The Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device performed well as a POC test for early diagnosis of COVID-19 in primary healthcare centres. More crucially, the data suggested that patients with RT-PCR-proven COVID-19 testing negative by RAD are unlikely to be infectious.
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.02338-20
发表时间: 2020-12-17
影响因子: 9.4
作者:
Young S;Taylor SN;Cammarata CL;Varnado KG;Roger-Dalbert C;Montano A;Griego-Fullbright C;Burgard C;Fernandez C;Eckert K;Andrews JC;Ren H;Allen J;Ackerman R;Cooper CK
通讯作者: Cooper CK
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa638
发表时间: 2020-11-15
影响因子: 11.8
作者:
Bullard, Jared;Dust, Kerry;Poliquin, Guillaume
通讯作者: Poliquin, Guillaume
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104659
发表时间: 2020-12
期刊: Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology
影响因子: --
作者:
Linares M;Pérez-Tanoira R;Carrero A;Romanyk J;Pérez-García F;Gómez-Herruz P;Arroyo T;Cuadros J
通讯作者: Cuadros J
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2196-x
发表时间: 2020-04-01
期刊: NATURE
影响因子: 64.8
作者:
Woelfel, Roman;Corman, Victor M.;Wendtner, Clemens
通讯作者: Wendtner, Clemens
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104455
发表时间: 2020-08-01
影响因子: 8.8
作者:
Scohy, Anais;Anantharajah, Ahalieyah;Rodriguez-Villalobos, Hector
通讯作者: Rodriguez-Villalobos, Hector