Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres.
Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.cmi.2020.11.004
复制
发表时间:
2021-03
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Navarro D
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Albert E;Torres I;Bueno F;Huntley D;Molla E;Fernández-Fuentes MÁ;Martínez M;Poujois S;Forqué L;Valdivia A;Solano de la Asunción C;Ferrer J;Colomina J;Navarro D
To our knowledge no previous study has assessed the performance of a rapid antigen diagnostic immunoassay (RAD) conducted at the point of care (POC). We evaluated the Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device for diagnosis of coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) in symptomatic patients (n = 412) attending primary healthcare centres. RAD was performed immediately after sampling following the manufacturer's instructions (reading at 15 min). RT-PCRs were carried out within 24 h of specimen collection. Samples displaying discordant results were processed for culture in Vero E6 cells. Presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in cell cultures was confirmed by RT-PCR. Out of 412 patients, 43 (10.4%) tested positive by RT-PCR and RAD, and 358 (86.9%) tested negative by both methods; discordant results (RT-PCR+/RAD–) were obtained in 11 patients (2.7%). Overall specificity and sensitivity of rapid antigen detection (RAD) was 100% (95%CI 98.7–100%) and 79.6% (95%CI 67.0–88.8%), respectively, taking RT-PCR as the reference. Overall RAD negative predictive value for an estimated prevalence of 5% and 10% was 99% (95%CI 97.4–99.6%) and 97.9% (95%CI 95.9–98.9), respectively. SARS-CoV-2 could not be cultured from specimens yielding RT-PCR+/RAD– results (n = 11). The Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device performed well as a POC test for early diagnosis of COVID-19 in primary healthcare centres. More crucially, the data suggested that patients with RT-PCR-proven COVID-19 testing negative by RAD are unlikely to be infectious.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
9.4
作者:
Young S;Taylor SN;Cammarata CL;Varnado KG;Roger-Dalbert C;Montano A;Griego-Fullbright C;Burgard C;Fernandez C;Eckert K;Andrews JC;Ren H;Allen J;Ackerman R;Cooper CK
通讯作者:
Cooper CK
影响因子:
11.8
作者:
Bullard, Jared;Dust, Kerry;Poliquin, Guillaume
通讯作者:
Poliquin, Guillaume
DOI:
10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104659
发表时间:
2020-12
期刊:
Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology
影响因子:
--
作者:
Linares M;Pérez-Tanoira R;Carrero A;Romanyk J;Pérez-García F;Gómez-Herruz P;Arroyo T;Cuadros J
通讯作者:
Cuadros J
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Woelfel, Roman;Corman, Victor M.;Wendtner, Clemens
通讯作者:
Wendtner, Clemens
影响因子:
8.8
作者:
Scohy, Anais;Anantharajah, Ahalieyah;Rodriguez-Villalobos, Hector
通讯作者:
Rodriguez-Villalobos, Hector