A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Efficacy of selenium treatment for sepsis

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Efficacy of selenium treatment for sepsis
复制标题

DOI:
10.1097/md.0000000000014733
复制
发表时间:
2019-03-01
期刊:
影响因子:
1.6
通讯作者:
Tan, Liping
Tan, Liping
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Li, Shaojun;Tang, Tian;Tan, Liping

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景资料:为了了解硒治疗脓毒症综合征患者的临床结局,我们对随机对照试验(RCT)进行了荟萃分析。方法:系统回顾了13项比较硒和安慰剂治疗脓毒症患者的RCT。结果:然而,在这方面,我们无法检测到硒治疗与不同时间过程中死亡率降低的相关性,(相对风险[RR] [95%置信区间,CI]:第28天0.94 [0.82-1.06];第90天0.73 [0.36-1.47]; 6个月1.16 [0.78-1.71])。补充硒在肾衰竭发生率、继发感染或机械通气持续时间方面未显示出有利的疗效(RR [95% CI]:0.65 [0.41-1.03]; 0.96 [0.87-1.06];标准平均差[SMD] [95% CI]:0.17 [-0.30-0.63];分别)。有趣的是,我们发现硒治疗对脓毒症患者有益,可减少血管加压治疗的持续时间,在重症监护室和医院的停留时间,以及呼吸机相关性肺炎的发生率(SMD [95% CI]:-0.75 [-1.37 to -0.13]; -0.15 [CI:-0.25 to -0.04]; -1.22 [-2.44 to -0.01]; RR [95% CI]:0.61 [0.42-0.89];分别)。根据我们的研究结果,不能建议常规使用静脉补硒。
Background: To understand the clinical outcomes of selenium therapy in patients with sepsis syndrome, we conducted a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT).Methods: A total of 13 RCTs comparing selenium and placebo for patients with sepsis were reviewed systematically.Results: However, we could not detect the association of selenium treatment with a decreased mortality at different time course (relative risk [RR] [95% confidence interval, CI]: 0.94 [0.82-1.06] at day 28; 0.73 [0.36-1.47] at day 90; 1.16 [0.78-1.71] at 6 months; respectively). Selenium supplementation did not show favorable efficacy in the incidence of renal failure, secondary infection or duration of mechanical ventilation (RR [95% CI]: 0.65 [0.41-1.03]; 0.96 [0.87-1.06]; standard mean difference [SMD] [95% CI]: 0.17 [-0.30-0.63]; respectively). Interestingly, we found that selenium therapy was benefit for sepsis patients with reduced duration of vasopressor therapy, staying time in intensive care unit and hospital, and incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (SMD [95% CI]: -0.75 [-1.37 to -0.13]; -0.15 [CI: -0.25 to -0.04]; -1.22 [-2.44 to -0.01]; RR [95% CI]: 0.61 [0.42-0.89]; respectively).Conclusion: Based on our findings, intravenous selenium supplementation could not be suggested for routine use.