Nonlinear dynamic-based analysis of severe dysphonia in patients with vocal fold scar and sulcus vocalis.
Nonlinear dynamic-based analysis of severe dysphonia in patients with vocal fold scar and sulcus vocalis.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.09.006
复制
发表时间:
2012-09
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Welham NV
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Choi SH;Zhang Y;Jiang JJ;Bless DM;Welham NV
The primary goal of this study was to evaluate a nonlinear dynamic approach to the acoustic analysis of dysphonia associated with vocal fold scar and sulcus vocalis. Case-control study. Acoustic voice samples from scar/sulcus patients and age/sex-matched controls were analyzed using correlation dimension (D2) and phase plots, time-domain based perturbation indices (jitter, shimmer, signal-to-noise ratio [SNR]), and an auditory-perceptual rating scheme. Signal typing was performed to identify samples with bifurcations and aperiodicity. Type 2 and 3 acoustic signals were highly represented in the scar/sulcus patient group. When data were analyzed irrespective of signal type, all perceptual and acoustic indices successfully distinguished scar/sulcus patients from controls. Removal of type 2 and 3 signals eliminated the previously identified differences between experimental groups for all acoustic indices except D2. The strongest perceptual-acoustic correlation in our dataset was observed for SNR; the weakest correlation was observed for D2. These findings suggest that D2 is inferior to time-domain based perturbation measures for the analysis of dysphonia associated with scar/sulcus; however, time-domain based algorithms are inherently susceptible to inflation under highly aperiodic (i.e., type 2 and 3) signal conditions. Auditory-perceptual analysis, unhindered by signal aperiodicity, is therefore a robust strategy for distinguishing scar/sulcus patient voices from normal voices. Future acoustic analysis research in this area should consider alternative (e.g., frequency- and quefrency-domain based) measures alongside additional nonlinear approaches.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
2.6
作者:
Dejonckere, PH;Bradley, P;Woisard, V
通讯作者:
Woisard, V
影响因子:
2.4
作者:
BERRY, DA;HERZEL, H;KRISCHER, K
通讯作者:
KRISCHER, K
影响因子:
1.7
作者:
Dailey, SH;Ford, CN
通讯作者:
Ford, CN
影响因子:
4
作者:
GRASSBERGER, P;PROCACCIA, I
通讯作者:
PROCACCIA, I
影响因子:
2.2
作者:
Behrman, A;Agresti, CJ;Lee, N
通讯作者:
Lee, N