A diffractive and Deleuzian approach to analysing interview data
A diffractive and Deleuzian approach to analysing interview data
复制标题
分析访谈数据的衍射和德勒兹方法
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Hillevi Lenz Taguchi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hillevi Lenz Taguchi
本文通过对学前班一名六岁男孩的采访数据进行衍射分析，探讨了考虑知识生产中“物质和意义如何相互构成”的可能性（Barad，2007：152）。受Donna Haraway（1997）和Karen Barad（2007）理论的启发，我将衍射分析理解为与研究数据的实质性的具体参与：作为研究人员的数据的祝福。将身体理解为一个过境空间，一系列与物质-话语“环境”相互作用的开放式系统，衍射分析构成了与数据的跨皮质接触。斯泰西·阿莱莫（2010）的超皮层理论与吉尔·德勒兹（Gilles Deleuze）和费利克斯·瓜塔里（Felix Guattari）（1987）关于成为少数人或少数人主义者的过程的思想进行了衍射。这意味着将思维行为本身重新概念化为一种跨皮质的参与过程，超越了反身性和解释的概念，即研究者的头脑中发生的内在心理活动被理解为与数据分离。通过我的例子，我认为，衍射分析可以使可见的新种类的物质话语的现实，可以有变革和政治后果。
This article explores the possibilities of considering how ‘matter and meaning are mutually constituted’ in the production of knowledge (Barad, 2007: 152) through presenting a diffractive analysis of a piece of interview data with a six-year-old boy in a preschool class. Inspired by Donna Haraway’s (1997) and Karen Barad’s (2007) theorising, I understand diffractive analysis as an embodied engagement with the materiality of research data: a becoming-with the data as researcher. Understanding the body as a space of transit, a series of open-ended systems in interaction with the material-discursive ‘environment’, diffractive analyses constitute transcorporeal engagements with data. Stacy Alaimo’s (2010) theorisation of the transcorporeal is put to work diffractively with Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari’s (1987) thinking on the process of becoming minor or minoritarian. This implies a reconceptualisation of the very act of thinking as a transcorporeal process of engagement, going beyond the idea of reflexivity and interpretation as inner mental activities taking place in the mind of the researcher understood as separated from the data. Through my example, I argue that diffractive analysis can make visible new kinds of material-discursive realities that can have transformative and political consequences.