LEGITIMIZING CLAIMS FOR 'CRISIS' LEADERSHIP IN GLOBAL GOVERNANCE The discourse of nuclear non-proliferation
LEGITIMIZING CLAIMS FOR 'CRISIS' LEADERSHIP IN GLOBAL GOVERNANCE The discourse of nuclear non-proliferation
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/17405904.2014.974636
复制
发表时间：
2015-01-01
影响因子：
1.5
通讯作者：
Rethel, Lena
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Schnurr, Stephanie;Homolar, Alexandra;Rethel, Lena
本文探讨了在核扩散危机的背景下，合法化的领导索赔的话语过程。文本的三个补充分析进行：话语分析联合国安全理事会（UNSC）的决议和美国政府成员的相关发言，以及在美国和英国的主要报纸发表的核扩散的新闻媒体帐户的语料库分析。研究结果表明，领导索赔的合法化，通过一系列的话语策略，这是在不同的文本类型相呼应。然而，不同的数据集的组合和比较，这些发现的角度来看，并揭示了这些领导力索赔的各种背景和文本类型显着不同，在他们使用的有关领导力和危机的相关术语。我们认为，这种动态是最好的合法化的（间）话语链的概念。
This paper explores the discursive processes of legitimizing leadership claims in the context of the nuclear proliferation crisis. Three complementary analyses of texts are carried out: discourse analyses of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions and relevant speeches by members of the US administration, as well as a corpus analysis of news media accounts of nuclear proliferation published in prominent US and UK broadsheets. Findings suggest that leadership claims are legitimized through a range of discursive strategies, which are echoed across the different text types. However, a combination and comparison of the different datasets puts these findings into perspective and reveals that the various contexts and text types in which these leadership claims are made differ remarkably in terms of their use of relevant terms relating to leadership and crisis. We argue that this dynamic is best captured by the notion of an (inter)discursive chain of legitimization.