Social Citizenship, Social Policy and Refugee Integration: a Case of Policy Divergence in Scotland?
Social Citizenship, Social Policy and Refugee Integration: a Case of Policy Divergence in Scotland?
复制标题
社会公民、社会政策和难民融入：苏格兰政策分歧的案例？
作者：
G. Mulvey
摘要霍利鲁德和威斯敏斯特之间的关系是一个不断发展的关系，有一些证据表明，政策分歧。政策方针的基础是对社会公民的不同看法，霍利鲁德方针保留了1945年后福利解决方案的要素。难民和寻求庇护者在这些不同办法中的地位目前尚未得到充分探讨。本文探讨了苏格兰和英国政府对社会权利的看法，以及这些权利如何适用于寻求庇护者和难民。它表明，尽管难民"政策"至少在一定程度上被保留，但苏格兰政府已经能够采取与威斯敏斯特不同的方法，这种方法得到了这些不同福利前景的支持。
Abstract The relationship between Holyrood and Westminster is an evolving one where there is some evidence of policy divergence. Underpinning policy approaches are different views of social citizenship, with the Holyrood approach maintaining elements of the post-1945 welfare settlement. The place of refugees and asylum seekers within these differing approaches is currently underexplored. This article looks at the Scottish and UK Governments’ views of social rights and how they apply to asylum seekers and refugees. It suggests that despite refugee ‘policy’ being at least partly reserved, the Scottish Government has been able to take a different approach from that of Westminster, an approach underpinned by these differing welfare outlooks.
在难民之外寻求安全：移民和公民政策对英国难民的影响
影响因子：
3.3
作者：
Stewart E
通讯作者：
Stewart E