Surveillance and Control of the Street in Renaissance Italy
Surveillance and Control of the Street in Renaissance Italy
复制标题
文艺复兴时期意大利街道的监视和控制
DOI：
10.1086/673404
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Nevola F
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Nevola F
1468年3月20日，彼得罗·迪·克里斯托法诺·迪·南尼（Pietro di Cristofano di Nanni）和巴托洛梅奥·迪·彼得罗·卡洛·皮科洛米尼（Bartolomeo di Pietro Carlo Piccolomini）向锡耶纳市最高法院提交了一份请愿书，要求减轻他们因上个月发生的一起事件而受到的处罚。1他们的请愿书很长，从他们的角度提供了事件的完整描述。值得注意的是，同一系列档案中共有四份请愿书，提出了涉及所涉事件的总共14名男子的同一案件。除了皮科洛米尼家族之外，其他主要家族的成员，如尼科洛奇家族和阿林吉耶里家族，以及许多其他家族也参与其中。这些文件虽然基本上是重复的，但每一份都提供了更多的细节，因此对事件有了一个相对完整的了解。那么，到底发生了什么？这些事件告诉了我们15世纪锡耶纳城市公共空间中的权力关系是什么？2月26日，这14个人在夜间外出，遇到了“警察”，这是该市司法办公室的一名武装官员，他有一小群武装追随者（他的家人）。2一场小冲突爆发了，骑士被箭射伤。不幸的是，从骑士的角度详细描述事件的法律的诉讼程序在档案中缺失，因此我们无法重新组合判决结果
ON MARCH 20, 1468, Pietro di Cristofano di Nanni and Bartolomeo di Pietro Carlo Piccolomini delivered a petition to the city of Siena’s supreme magistracy, the Concistoro, seeking the reduction of a penalty inflicted on them for an incident that had taken place the previous month. 1 Their petition is a long one and provides a full account of the events—from their point of view. Remarkably, the same archival series contains a total of four petitions presenting the same case for a total of fourteen men involved in the events in question. In addition to the Piccolomini, members of other leading families such as the Niccolucci and Aringhieri were involved, as well as numerous others. These documents, while largely repeating themselves, each offer additional details, so that a relatively complete picture emerges of the incident. So what happened, and what do these events tell us about power relations articulated in urban public space in fifteenth-century Siena? On February 26, the fourteen men had been out and about at night and had run into the “cavaliere del podestà,” an armed official of the city’s judicial office who had a small group of armed followers with him (his famiglia). 2 A skirmish broke out in which the cavaliere was lightly wounded by an arrow. Unfortunately the legal proceedings that would have detailed the events from the cavaliere’s perspective are missing in the archive, so we cannot reassemble how the verdict was