In vivo scaling and root planing forces.
In vivo scaling and root planing forces.
复制标题
体内刮治力和根面平整力。
DOI：
10.1902/jop.1991.62.5.335
复制
发表时间：
1991
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
D. Case
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
U. Zappa;J. Cadosch;C. Simona;H. Graf;D. Case
本研究的目的是评估体内施加的结垢和根刨力。10名牙医和10名牙科保健师在未治疗的晚期牙周炎成年患者的门牙的一个方面进行了缩放和根刨。在除垢和刨根过程中，使用压电接收器、电子换能器和类似的书写器记录力。力以mA为单位记录，并换算成牛顿(N)。结果表明,扩展应用武力牙医的平均值为5.70 N,介于1.01到10.35 N之间相应的值为牙科保健是一个平均的5.38 N,以及一系列的1.52到15.73 N根滑行部队在牙医达到平均4.62 N,以及介于0.86至8.88之间N为保健,这些值是4.58 N范围为1.56到10.59 N .负面力量影响牙周软组织也记录下来。它们并不存在于所有的治疗师身上，但在特定的治疗师身上一直存在。在缩放过程中，这些力在牙医中达到-0.40 N，在牙科卫生员中达到-0.47 N。在牙根刨平期间，这些力在牙医中平均为-0.59 N，在卫生员中平均为-0.81 N。牙垢力与牙根刨平力之间、牙医与卫生员使用的牙根刨平力之间均无统计学差异（P > 0.05）。然而，在牙根刨平过程中，个体治疗师的力水平在所有正面力（P = 0.0001）和负面力（P = 0.0001）方面存在显著差异。这项调查提供的技术和信息可能有助于评估刮治和刨根剂量的临床效果的研究。
The purpose of the present study was to assess the scaling and root planing forces exerted in vivo. Ten dentists and 10 dental hygienists scaled and root planed one aspect of an incisor in an adult patient with untreated advanced periodontitis. During scaling and root planing forces were recorded using a piezo-electric receiver, an electronic transducer, and an analogous writer. The forces were recorded in mA and converted into Newtons (N). The results showed that the mean scaling force applied by dentists was 5.70 N and ranged between 1.01 to 10.35 N. The corresponding values for dental hygienists were a mean of 5.38 N, and a range of 1.52 to 15.73 N. The root planing forces in dentists reached a mean of 4.62 N, and ranged between 0.86 to 8.88 N. For hygienists, these values were 4.58 N with a range of 1.56 to 10.59 N. Negative forces impacting on the periodontal soft tissues were also recorded. They were not present in all therapists, but consistently at work within specific therapists. During scaling these forces reached a mean of -0.40 N in dentists and -0.47 N in dental hygienists. During root planing, these forces were mean -0.59 N in dentists, and -0.81 N in hygienists. There were no statistically significant differences between scaling forces and root planing forces, nor between forces used by dentists and hygienists (P greater than 0.05). However, there were significant differences between the force levels of the individual therapists for all positive forces (P = 0.0001), and for negative forces during root planing (P = 0.0001). The technology and information provided by this investigation may enable studies evaluating clinical effectiveness of scaling and root planing doses.