A Comprehensive Resiliency Framework: Theoretical Model, Treatment, and Evaluation.
A Comprehensive Resiliency Framework: Theoretical Model, Treatment, and Evaluation.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/21649561211000306
复制
发表时间：
2021-01-01
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Lechner, Suzanne C
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Park, Elyse R;Luberto, Christina M;Lechner, Suzanne C
背景：复原力的概念存在异质性，到目前为止，还没有确定的理论驱动的复原力评估措施与有针对性的复原力干预措施相一致。我们将弹性作为一个人在应对持续的、长期的日常生活压力时保持适应功能的能力，并使用一种新的弹性衡量标准来评估基于证据的弹性干预的目标组成部分。我们介绍了我们的复原力理论、治疗模型和相应的评估工具(当前经验量表)。方法：为了建立当前经验量表的心理测量学特性，我们报告了该量表的因素结构和内部一致性信度(N=273)。在我们的复原力干预的参与者(N=151)中，我们从理论模型结构、有效的复原力测量以及对干预前后变化的敏感度方面对结构效度进行了探索。结果：结果表明，由23个条目、6个因素组成的解决方案很好地符合数据(RMSEA=.08，CFI=.97；TLI=.96)，内部一致性良好(α=.81到.95)。CES在预期方向上与弹性模型结构(所有p
BACKGROUND: There is heterogeneity in conceptualizations of resiliency, and there is, to date, no established theoretically driven resiliency assessment measure that aligns with a targeted resiliency intervention. We operationalize resiliency as one's ability to maintain adaptive functioning in response to the ongoing, chronic stress of daily living, and we use a novel resiliency measure that assesses the target components of an evidence based resiliency intervention. We present our resiliency theory, treatment model, and corresponding assessment measure (Current Experience Scale; CES).METHODS: To establish the psychometric properties of the CES, we report the factor structure and internal consistency reliability (N=273). Among participants in our resiliency intervention (N=151), we explored construct validity in terms of associations with theoretical model constructs, a validated resiliency measure, and sensitivity to change from before to after the intervention.RESULTS: Results indicated that a 23-item, 6-factor solution was a good fit to the data (RMSEA=.08, CFI=.97; TLI =.96) and internal consistency was good (alpha=.81 to .95). The CES showed correlations in the expected direction with resiliency model constructs (all p's