Factor analysis of computerized and traditional tests used in mild brain injury research
Factor analysis of computerized and traditional tests used in mild brain injury research
复制标题
DOI：
10.1076/1385-4046(200008)14:3;1-p;ft287
复制
发表时间：
2000-08-01
影响因子：
3.9
通讯作者：
Halpern, E
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bleiberg, J;Kane, RL;Halpern, E
本研究探讨了一组计算机化神经心理学测量、自动神经心理学评估指标（ANAM）与一组传统临床神经心理学测试之间的关系。最近的轻度脑损伤研究中均采用了这两组测试。因子分析和逐步回归表明，两组测试测量的认知处理速度、抗干扰能力和工作记忆等基本结构相似。目前的研究结果表明计算机化和传统神经心理学测量之间具有很强的一致性，并支持 ANAM 和类似程序的结构有效性。
The present study examines the relation between a set of computerized neuropsychological measures, Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM), acid a set of traditional clinical neuropsychological tests. Both sets of tests have been employed in recent studies of mild brain injury. Factor analysis and stepwise regression indicate that both sets of tests measure similar underlying constructs of cognitive processing speed, resistance to interference, and working memory. The present findings indicate strong concordance between computerized and traditional neuropsychological measures and support the construct validity of ANAM and similar procedures.