What's in a (Change of) Name? Much, but Not That Much and Not What Wiebe Claims
What's in a (Change of) Name? Much, but Not That Much and Not What Wiebe Claims
复制标题
姓名（更改）包含什么内容？
DOI：
10.1163/15700682-12341478
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
0.6
通讯作者：
Satoko Fujiwara and Tim Jensen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
野家啓一;西谷功;Ayumi Takeshima;Jeremiah Alberg;井上貴恵;村瀬智之;藁科智恵;野家啓一;宮崎展昌;大谷弘;鈴木崇志;下川潔;村上明也;村瀬智之;植村玄輝;Shinichi Nagao;Satoko Fujiwara and Tim Jensen
Donald Wiebe声称IAHR的领导层（在德尔菲的一次扩大执行委员会（EEC）会议之前）已经决定降低IAHR的学术标准，并提议将其名称改为“国际生物学研究协会”。他的批评，我们认为，是基于一系列的误解：1）之间的区别咨询机构（EEC）和决策机构（EC），2）之间的差异的初步观点的个人和最终建议的theEC，3）个人谈话，4）之间的联系，建议改变名称和希望收紧theIAHR的学术形象。此外，如果最终决策机构，国际委员会和大会，通过该建议，新的名称一样少，旧的可以使IAHR或多或少的科学。加强IAHR的学术和科学形象不仅仅是改变名称。
Donald Wiebe claims that theIAHRleadership (already before an Extended Executive Committee (EEC) meeting in Delphi) had decided to water down the academic standards of theIAHRwith a proposal to change its name to “International Association for the Study of Religions.” His criticism, we argue, is based on a series of misunderstandings as regards: 1) the difference between the consultative body (EEC) and the decision-making body (EC), 2) the difference between the preliminary points of view of individuals and final proposals by theEC, 3) personal conversations, 4) the link between the proposal to change the name and the wish to tighten up the academic profile of theIAHR. Moreover, if the final decision-making bodies, the International Committee and the General Assembly, adopt the proposal, the new name as little as the old can make theIAHRmore or less scientific. Tightening up the academic, scientific profile of theIAHRtakes more than a change of name.