Feasibility of Using Ecological Momentary Assessment to Study Unaided Smoking Cessation in Couples.
Feasibility of Using Ecological Momentary Assessment to Study Unaided Smoking Cessation in Couples.
复制标题
使用生态瞬时评估研究夫妻独立戒烟的可行性。
DOI：
10.1093/ntr/ntx240
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Hanny,Courtney
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Derrick,JayeL;Eliseo-Arras,RebeccaK;Haddad,Sana;Britton,Maggie;Hanny,Courtney
生态瞬时评估（EMA）是研究戒烟的一种有价值的方法，但其可行性尚未在承诺的夫妇中进行研究。目前的研究探讨进行EMA的研究，在单吸烟者couples.MethodsParticipants的可行性，62个单吸烟者的夫妇招募参加21天的研究，在单吸烟者couples.MethodsParticipants的戒烟。戒烟者和合作伙伴被告知每天完成一份晨间报告、三份信号报告和一份晚间报告，以及必要时的失效报告。他们还在基线和随访时完成了一系列问卷调查。本文探讨预测遵守报告instructions.ResultsCompliance与预定的报告是合理的（戒烟者：76%，合作伙伴：79%）。遵守"按时"报告（与弥补报告相比）的情况很差（戒烟者：62%，伴侣：43%）。戒烟者对失误报告的依从性与戒烟倾向密切相关。合作伙伴的遵守失效报告与关系动机。当合作伙伴不遵守时，退出者的遵守率会急剧下降。自我调节和情绪不稳定与依从性无关，但与完成报告的时间有关。戒烟者和合作伙伴的经验完成研究提供了一些洞察动态完成EMA研究的一部分，一个dyad.ConclusionsOverall，这项研究表明，它是可行的和有效的收集EMA数据戒烟夫妇。然而，对失效报告的合规性很差，尤其是对于合作伙伴来说。研究人员可以提供不同的时间表上的报酬，提供较短的失效报告，或忽略合作伙伴失效reportsaltogether. ImplicationsThis article研究遵守计划和失效报告单吸烟夫妇在一个独立的戒烟尝试。遵守定期报告是可以接受的，但遵守失效报告的情况很差，尤其是对合作伙伴而言。戒烟者对失误报告的依从性受到戒烟倾向的严重影响，这表明改善对戒烟动机的筛查可能会提高依从率。当合作伙伴不遵守时，退出者的遵守情况也会急剧下降。合作伙伴人口统计数据和关系动机是合规性的最佳预测因素。为了提高合规性，研究人员可能会提供不同规模的薪酬，大幅缩短失效报告，甚至省略合作伙伴失效报告。
IntroductionEcological momentary assessment (EMA) is a valuable method for studying smoking cessation, but feasibility has not been examined in committed couples. The current study examines the feasibility of conducting an EMA study of unaided smoking cessation in single-smoker couples.MethodsParticipants were 62 single-smoker couples recruited to participate in a 21-day study of unaided smoking cessation. Quitters and Partners were given instructions to complete one morning report, three signaled reports, and one evening report per day, as well as lapse reports when necessary. They also completed a series of questionnaires at baseline and follow-up. This article examines predictors of compliance with the reporting instructions.ResultsCompliance with scheduled reporting was reasonable (Quitters: 76%, Partners: 79%). Compliance with “on-time” lapse reporting (vs. make-up reporting) was poor (Quitters: 62%, Partners: 43%). Quitters’ compliance with lapse reporting was strongly associated with an orientation toward quitting. Partners’ compliance with lapse reporting was associated with relationship motivation. Quitter compliance plummeted when Partners were noncompliant. Self-regulation and emotional instability were not associated with compliance but were associated with time to complete reports. Quitters’ and Partners’ experiences completing the study provide some insight into the dynamics of completing an EMA study as part of a dyad.ConclusionsOverall, this study suggests it is feasible and effective to collect EMA data on smoking cessation from couples. However, compliance with lapse reporting was poor, especially for Partners. Researchers could provide remuneration on a different schedule, provide shorter lapse reports, or omit Partner lapse reports altogether.ImplicationsThis article examined compliance with scheduled and lapse reporting in single-smoker couples during an unaided quit attempt. Compliance with scheduled reporting was acceptable, but compliance with lapse reporting was poor, especially for Partners. Quitters’ compliance with lapse reporting was heavily influenced by an orientation toward quitting, suggesting that improved screening for motivation to quit might improve compliance rates. Quitter compliance also plummeted when Partners were noncompliant. Partner demographics and relationship motivation were the best predictors of compliance. To enhance compliance, researchers might provide remuneration on a different scale, dramatically shorten lapse reports, or even omit Partner lapse reports.