Rational Design and Adaptive Management of Combination Therapies for Hepatitis C Virus Infection.
Rational Design and Adaptive Management of Combination Therapies for Hepatitis C Virus Infection.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004040
复制
发表时间:
2015-06
影响因子:
4.3
通讯作者:
Lloyd-Smith JO
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ke R;Loverdo C;Qi H;Sun R;Lloyd-Smith JO
Recent discoveries of direct acting antivirals against Hepatitis C virus (HCV) have raised hopes of effective treatment via combination therapies. Yet rapid evolution and high diversity of HCV populations, combined with the reality of suboptimal treatment adherence, make drug resistance a clinical and public health concern. We develop a general model incorporating viral dynamics and pharmacokinetics/ pharmacodynamics to assess how suboptimal adherence affects resistance development and clinical outcomes. We derive design principles and adaptive treatment strategies, identifying a high-risk period when missing doses is particularly risky for de novo resistance, and quantifying the number of additional doses needed to compensate when doses are missed. Using data from large-scale resistance assays, we demonstrate that the risk of resistance can be reduced substantially by applying these principles to a combination therapy of daclatasvir and asunaprevir. By providing a mechanistic framework to link patient characteristics to the risk of resistance, these findings show the potential of rational treatment design. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) affects approximately 170 million people world-wide and chronic infections can lead to cirrhosis and liver cancer. New combination therapies of direct acting antivirals have achieved remarkably high cure rates in clinical trials. However, high mutation rates and high diversity of HCV populations, combined with the reality of suboptimal treatment adherence, make drug resistance a clinical and public health concern. By constructing a mechanistic framework to assess the risk of drug resistance, we provide guidelines for rational design and adaptive management of these promising new therapies. In particular, we identify a high-risk period when missing doses is particularly risky, and quantify the number of extra doses needed to compensate when doses are missed. This framework is a step towards developing a tool for clinicians to design combination therapies and adaptively manage treatment regimens to achieve favorable clinical outcomes.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
6.7
作者:
Gane, Edward
通讯作者:
Gane, Edward
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
Bangsberg, DR;Perry, S;Moss, A
通讯作者:
Moss, A
影响因子:
4.9
作者:
Fridell, Robert A.;Qiu, Dike;Gao, Min
通讯作者:
Gao, Min
影响因子:
13.5
作者:
Guedj, Jeremie;Perelson, Alan S.
通讯作者:
Perelson, Alan S.
影响因子:
39.2
作者:
Lo Re V 3rd;Teal V;Localio AR;Amorosa VK;Kaplan DE;Gross R
通讯作者:
Gross R