Identification of child maltreatment with the parent-child Conflict Tactics Scales: Development and psychometric data for a national sample of American parents
Identification of child maltreatment with the parent-child Conflict Tactics Scales: Development and psychometric data for a national sample of American parents
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/s0145-2134(97)00174-9
复制
发表时间：
1998-04-01
影响因子：
4.8
通讯作者：
Runyan, D
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Straus, MA;Hamby, SL;Runyan, D
目的：创建冲突策略量表（CTS）的亲子版，即CTSPC。
方法：描述所使用的概念和方法以及针对1000名具有全国代表性的美国儿童样本的心理测量数据。
结果：（1）改进了心理攻击和身体攻击量表。（2）新的非暴力管教量表、忽视补充量表以及关于管教方法和性虐待的补充问题。（3）信度从低到中等。（4）有区分效度和结构效度的证据。
结论：CTSPC比原版CTS更适合用于测量儿童虐待情况。它很简短（核心量表需6到8分钟），因此对于儿童虐待的流行病学研究和临床筛查具有实用性。还讨论了父母自我报告儿童虐待测量方法中固有的问题。（C）1998年M. A. 斯特劳斯。由爱思唯尔科学有限公司出版。
Objective: To create a parent-to-child version of the Conflict Tactics Scales, the CTSPC.Method: Description of the conceptual and methodological approaches used and psychometric data for a nationally representative sample of 1,000 U.S. children.Results: (1) Improved Psychological Aggression and Physical Assault scales. (2) New Nonviolent Discipline scale, supplementary scale for Neglect, and supplemental questions on discipline methods and sexual abuse. (3) Reliability ranges from low to moderate. (4) Evidence of discriminant and construct validity.Conclusions: The CTSPC is better suited to measuring child maltreatment than the original CTS. It is brief (6 to 8 minutes for the core scales) and therefore practical for epidemiological research on child maltreatment and for clinical screening. Methodological issues inherent in parent self-report measures of child maltreatment are discussed. (C) 1998 M. A. Straus. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.