Brownfield Development: A Comparison of North American and British Approaches
Brownfield Development: A Comparison of North American and British Approaches
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/0042098009346868
复制
发表时间：
2010-01-01
期刊：
影响因子：
4.7
通讯作者：
Tiesdell, Steven
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Adams, David;De Sousa, Christopher;Tiesdell, Steven
在过去的30-40年里，发达经济体的城市变化和去工业化造成了空置和闲置土地的遗留问题，这些土地越来越多地被视为发展机会，而不是规划问题。本文调查了如何将这些布朗菲尔德重新投入生产使用的共同挑战在四个国家得到不同的解释：美国，加拿大，苏格兰和英格兰。在每一种情况下，特定的政策环境都以不同的方式塑造了布朗菲尔德辩论，在布朗菲尔德再开发中产生了一套不同的公共和私营部门之间的关系。通过对北美和英国经验的详细比较，本文追溯了政策的成熟程度，并试图发现在理解和处理布朗菲尔德土地方面的主要差异是否可以主要归因于物理、文化或制度因素。
Over the past 30-40 years, urban change and deindustrialisation in advanced economies have created a legacy of vacant and derelict land that is increasingly seen as a development opportunity rather than planning problem. This paper investigates how the shared challenge of bringing such brownfield sites back into productive use has been interpreted differently in four countries: the US, Canada, Scotland and England. In each case, the particular policy environment has shaped the brownfield debate in distinctive ways, producing a different set of relations between the public and private sectors in brownfield redevelopment. Through this detailed comparison of the North American and British experience, the paper traces the maturity of policy and seeks to discover whether the main differences in understanding and tackling brownfield land can be attributed primarily to physical, cultural or institutional factors.