TRACING THE CONTOURS - FEMINIST RESEARCH AND FEMINIST OBJECTIVITY
TRACING THE CONTOURS - FEMINIST RESEARCH AND FEMINIST OBJECTIVITY
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/0277-5395(93)90001-p
复制
发表时间：
1993-03-01
影响因子：
1.4
通讯作者：
BHAVNANI, KK
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
BHAVNANI, KK
本文讨论了Donna Haraway在1988年关于女性主义客观性和情境知识的争论。作者认为，为了使女性主义研究增强女性主义的客观性，如Haraway所概述的，有必要划定一些原则或标准，根据这些原则或标准可以评估研究。作者认为，哈拉维指出的三个要素是核心的任何讨论的女性主义的客观性-问责制，定位，和partiality-导致三个问题，这反过来又框架的标准和原则，根据该研究可以被定义为实现目标的女性主义的客观性。本文正是对这三个标准-再定义标准、微观政治标准和差异标准进行了讨论和界定。作者用她最近对英国年轻工人阶级的研究来说明如何使用这些标准来实施和加强发展女权主义客观性的项目。
This paper discusses Donna Haraway's 1988 arguments about feminist objectivity and situated knowledges. The author suggests that in order for feminist research to enhance feminist objectivity, as outlined by Haraway, it is necessary to delineate some principles or criteria according to which research could be evaluated. The author argues that the three elements which Haraway points to as being central to any discussion of feminist objectivity-accountability, positioning, and partiality-lead to three questions, which, in turn frame criteria and principles according to which research may be defined as implementing the goal of feminist objectivity. It is these three criteria-reinscription, micropolitics and difference-which are discussed and defined in this paper. The author uses the example of her recent research with young working class people in Britain to demonstrate how the criteria may be used to implement and enhance the projects for developing feminist objectivity.