Successful Delivery of Public-Private Partnerships for Infrastructure Development

Successful Delivery of Public-Private Partnerships for Infrastructure Development
复制标题

DOI:
10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2007)133:12(918
复制
发表时间:
2007-12
影响因子:
2.5
通讯作者:
A. Aziz
A. Aziz
中科院分区:
工程技术4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Aziz

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

各国政府在实施公私伙伴关系方面采用了两种常见的办法:一种是以融资为基础的办法,旨在利用私人融资满足基础设施需求;另一种是以服务为基础的办法,旨在优化服务提供的时间和成本效率。然而,公私伙伴关系的实施可能会受到法律的、政治和文化障碍的影响。在美国,联邦政府通过了一些法案,以消除障碍,促进公私伙伴关系促进基础设施发展。基于对英国和加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省公私伙伴关系的详细分析,本文描述了在项目层面实施公私伙伴关系的原则(例如,是否成功)。这些原则涉及:公私伙伴关系法律的框架和执行单位的存在;对私人融资目标、风险分配后果和资金效益目标的认识;保持公私伙伴关系进程的透明度;程序标准化;以及使用业绩规格。结合美国公私伙伴关系的经验和障碍,解释和讨论了成功实施的准则。
Two common approaches have been used by governments for the implementation of public-private partnerships (PPPs): a finance-based approach that aims to use private financing to satisfy infrastructure needs, and a service-based approach that aims to optimize the time and cost efficiencies in service delivery. The implementation of PPPs, however, may suffer from legal, political, and cultural impediments. In the United States, the federal government enabled a number of acts to ease the impediments and promote PPPs for infrastructure development. Based on a detailed analysis of PPPs in the United Kingdom and British Columbia, Canada, this paper describes principles that would characterize the implementation of PPPs at the program level (e.g., whether the implementation is successful). The principles pertain to the: availability of a PPP legal framework and implementation units; perception of the private finance objectives, risk allocation consequences, and value-for-money objectives; maintenance of PPPs process transparency; standardization of procedures; and use of performance specifications. Guidelines for successful implementation are explained and discussed in the context of the United States PPPs experience and impediments.