APPLICATION AND EVALUATION OF STRATEGIES TO REDUCE POLLUTION - BEHAVIORAL CONTROL OF LITTERING IN A FOOTBALL STADIUM
APPLICATION AND EVALUATION OF STRATEGIES TO REDUCE POLLUTION - BEHAVIORAL CONTROL OF LITTERING IN A FOOTBALL STADIUM
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0021-9010.61.4.501
复制
发表时间：
1976-01-01
影响因子：
9.9
通讯作者：
HAYWARD, SC
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
BALTES, MM;HAYWARD, SC
试图在一个自然主义的环境中改变成年人乱扔垃圾的行为：足球场。使用了四种不同的治疗策略：（a）正强化程序形式的操作性应急;（B）2种提示程序，一种正提示和一种负提示策略;（c）仅垃圾袋条件。因变量定义为未归还窝仔的重量。在连续2场足球比赛中实施了两次治疗程序，并与无治疗条件进行了对比。“治疗”的学生是200名非大学季票持有者，他们分别在体育场的6个区域。研究结果显示，治疗的主要效果非常显着，这导致足球场治疗区域的垃圾量减少了45%。不同治疗策略之间无显著差异。结果进行了讨论，在实验室研究乱扔垃圾的儿童和未来的操作性研究领域的污染行为的前景。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
Attempted to modify adult littering behavior in a naturalistic setting: the football stadium. Four different treatment strategies were used:(a) an operant contingency in the form of a positive reinforcement procedure;(b) 2 prompting procedures, a positive prompting and a negative prompting strategy; and (c) a litterbag-only condition. The dependent variable was defined as the weight of nonreturned litter. Treatment procedures were implemented twice in 2 consecutive football games and contrasted with no-treatment conditions." Treated" Ss were 200 nonuniversity season-ticket holders in each of 6 sections of the stadium. Findings revealed a highly significant main effect of treatment, which was responsible for a 45% reduction in the amount of litter in the treated sections of the football stadium. There were no significant differential effects between the different treatment strategies. Results are discussed in relation to laboratory research on littering in children and with a perspective toward future operant research in the area of pollution behavior.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)