Proliferative potential and response to nivolumab in clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients

Proliferative potential and response to nivolumab in clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/2162402x.2020.1773200
复制
发表时间:
2020-01-01
期刊:
影响因子:
7.2
通讯作者:
Morrison, Carl
Morrison, Carl
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zhang, Tian;Pabla, Sarabjot;Morrison, Carl

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景:缺乏预测转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)免疫治疗反应的生物标志物。PD-L1免疫组化是mRCC中免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的补充诊断,但已显示出最小的临床效用,并且未用于常规临床实践。结果:对于用纳武单抗作为标准护理治疗的56名患者,有2名完全应答和8名部分应答,应答率为17.9%。将细胞增殖分为三分位数,来自参考肿瘤组中10个增殖相关基因的平均表达,低增殖性肿瘤(62.5%)比中度(30.4%)或高度增殖性(8.9%)肿瘤更常见。中度增殖性肿瘤富含PD-L1阳性(41.2%),而增殖性较差的肿瘤(11.4%)。中度增殖性肿瘤(29.4%)的客观缓解率高于低度增殖性肿瘤(11.4%),但无统计学显著性(p = 0.11)。当细胞增殖和阴性PD-L1肿瘤比例评分相结合时,获得了具有统计学意义的结果(p = 0.048),表明增殖性差和PD-L1阴性肿瘤患者的缓解率非常低与中度增殖性PD-L1阴性肿瘤(30%)相比,中度增殖性PD-L1阴性肿瘤(6.5%)。细胞增殖在预测透明细胞mRCC患者对nivolumab的反应方面具有价值,特别是当与PD-L1表达相结合时。需要进一步的研究,包括增加无进展生存期(PFS)沿着以及足够把握度的亚组,以进一步支持这些结果。
Background: Biomarkers predicting immunotherapy response in metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) are lacking. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry is a complementary diagnostic for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in mRCC, but has shown minimal clinical utility and is not used in routine clinical practice.Methods: Tumor specimens from 56 patients with mRCC who received nivolumab were evaluated for PD-L1, cell proliferation (targeted RNA-seq), and outcome.Results: For 56 patients treated with nivolumab as a standard of care, there were 2 complete responses and 8 partial responses for a response rate of 17.9%. Dividing cell proliferation into tertiles, derived from the mean expression of 10 proliferation-associated genes in a reference set of tumors, poorly proliferative tumors (62.5%) were more common than moderately (30.4%) or highly proliferative (8.9%) counterparts. Moderately proliferative tumors were enriched for PD-L1 positive (41.2%), compared to poorly proliferative counterparts (11.4%). Objective response for moderately proliferative (29.4%) tumors was higher than that of poorly (11.4%) proliferative counterparts, but not statistically significant (p = .11). When cell proliferation and negative PD-L1 tumor proportion scores were combined statistically significant results were achieved (p = .048), showing that patients with poorly proliferative and PD-L1 negative tumors have a very low response rate (6.5%) compared to moderately proliferative PD-L1 negative tumors (30%).Conclusions: Cell proliferation has value in predicting response to nivolumab in clear cell mRCC patients, especially when combined with PD-L1 expression. Further studies which include the addition of progression-free survival (PFS) along with sufficiently powered subgroups are required to further support these findings.