Void and filled supramolecular nanoprisms-notable differences between seemingly identical construction principles.
Void and filled supramolecular nanoprisms-notable differences between seemingly identical construction principles.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1039/b808988d
复制
发表时间：
2008-10
影响因子：
4.9
通讯作者：
M. Schmittel;Bice He
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Schmittel;Bice He
利用（三联吡啶）-Zn（2+）-（菲咯啉）络合物作为动态和杂配构建基序（HETTAP方法），以定量产率提供空隙和填充的超分子纳米棱柱（空隙：4900 A（3）），但仅当在自组装中充当面板和支柱的单元就其动力学行为进行优化时。
Void and filled supramolecular nanoprisms (void: 4900 A(3)) were furnished in quantitative yield utilising the (terpyridine)-Zn(2+)-(phenanthroline) complex as a dynamic and heteroleptic building motif (HETTAP approach), but only if units serving as panels and pillars in the self-assembly were optimised with regard to their kinetic behaviour.