Evaluation of the spatter-reduction effectiveness of two dry-field isolation techniques.
Evaluation of the spatter-reduction effectiveness of two dry-field isolation techniques.
复制标题
评估两种干场隔离技术的飞溅还原有效性。
DOI:
10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0064
复制
发表时间:
2012-11
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Walker RS
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dahlke WO;Cottam MR;Herring MC;Leavitt JM;Ditmyer MM;Walker RS
The authors conducted a study to compare the effectiveness of two dry-field isolation techniques with that of a control technique (no isolation) in reducing spatter from a dental operative site. The authors designed a benchtop experiment to evaluate spatter patterns after performing simulated occlusal surface preparations on three typodont teeth in a dental manikin. Fluorescein dye served as the marker to enable visualization of the spatter distribution. The authors compared the effectiveness of a nonisolated control consisting of high-volume evacuation (HVE) alone with that of two dry-field isolation techniques: a dental dam with HVE and the Isolite system (Isolite Systems, Santa Barbara, Calif). The authors performed a two-way analysis of variance. Both the Isolite device and the dental dam with HVE exhibited a significant decrease in the number of contaminated squares (P < .001) compared with that for the nonisolated control. In addition, overall, the results showed no statistically significant difference between the Isolite system and the dental dam with HVE (P = .126). The study results showed that use of a dental dam with HVE or the Isolite system significantly reduced spatter overall compared with use of HVE alone. Isolation with a dental dam and HVE or with the Isolite system appears to aid in the reduction of spatter during operative dental procedures, potentially reducing exposure to oral pathogens.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.14219/jada.archive.1989.0131
发表时间:
1989-07-01
影响因子:
3.9
作者:
COCHRAN, MA;MILLER, CH;SHELDRAKE, MA
通讯作者:
SHELDRAKE, MA
影响因子:
7.6
作者:
MILLER, RL;MICIK, RE;RYGE, G
通讯作者:
RYGE, G
DOI:
10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0142
发表时间:
2002-02-01
影响因子:
3.9
作者:
Siegel, SC;von Fraunhofer, JA
通讯作者:
von Fraunhofer, JA
DOI:
10.14219/jada.archive.1994.0093
发表时间:
1994-05-01
影响因子:
3.9
作者:
BENTLEY, CD;BURKHART, NW;CRAWFORD, JJ
通讯作者:
CRAWFORD, JJ
影响因子:
7.6
作者:
MICIK, RE;MILLER, RL;RYGE, G
通讯作者:
RYGE, G