IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
复制标题
美国特拉华州地方法院
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2006
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Bennett
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
D. Jennifer;Bennett
MEMORANDUM Before the court is Defendant’s motion to strike (D.I. 151) a portion of Plaintiff’s infringement arguments1: infringement under the doctrine of equivalents (DOE) with respect to “user accessible functions”; infringement under the DOE with respect to “system fingerprint information in the dynamic license database”; and theories of literal infringement for the “graphical user interface” (“GUI”) limitation that rely on third party software and media server software. (D.I. 151 at 2). The matter has been briefed in letters (D.I. 151, 152, 155, 158, 161) related to a discovery dispute (D.I. 150), for which I conferred with the parties on January 13, 2021 (D.I. 157). A. LEGAL STANDARDS Infringement contentions are considered “initial disclosures” under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a). See United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Default Standard