Plant derived tissue and soil nutrient concentration for plantations of four conifer species growing under different site and vegetation management conditions
Plant derived tissue and soil nutrient concentration for plantations of four conifer species growing under different site and vegetation management conditions
复制标题
不同地点和植被管理条件下生长的四种针叶树种人工林的植物来源组织和土壤养分浓度
DOI:
10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119300
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Wightman, Maxwell
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Cannon, Callan;Gonzalez-Benecke, Carlos;Wightman, Maxwell
This study investigates the long-term effects of vegetation management on nutrient concentration of various tissues and ecosystem components of 16 to 18 year-old Douglas-fir (DF), western hemlock (WH), western redcedar (WRC), and grand fir (GF) stands growing in Oregon’s central Coast Range (CR) and DF and WRC growing in Oregon’s Cascade mountain foothills (CF) under two contrasting vegetation management (VM) treatments. The treatments consist of: Control, which received no herbicide application post planting, and VM, which received five years of spring release herbicide application. Both treatments include a fall site preparation herbicide application. The ecosystem was broken down into crop trees (separated into foliage, live branches, bark, and stemwood), midstory species (separated into foliage and stem), understory, forest floor, fine roots, and mineral soil (with depth increments 0.0–0.2 m, 0.2–0.4 m, 0.4–0.6 m, and 0.6–1.0 m). All samples were analyzed for concentration of total carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium, sulfur, boron, copper, iron, manganese, sodium, and zinc. This study design resulted in 1,740 unique nutrient concentration results being reported. The effect of VM (treatment) on tissue concentration varied by nutrient, overstory crop species (species), ecosystem component, and site. Forest floor and crop tree bark, followed by fine roots, were the ecosystem component nutrient concentrations that showed the greatest number of treatment effects across all species. Soil concentrations showed large variation across sites but were generally unaffected by treatment and species. At the CR site, magnesium and calcium soil concentrations were higher in VM plots across species, while zinc concentrations were lower. There were no other effects of treatment on soil nutrient concentrations, but there were some significant treatment × crop species interactions. Most notably, at the CF site, the concentration of C and N were higher in VM plots than control plots of DF, while the opposite was true for WRC. While total soil concentrations were generally unaffected by treatment and are unlikely to be adversely affected in the long term, it is possible that VM can reduce soil nitrogen for slow growing species like WRC.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
E. L. Stone
通讯作者:
E. L. Stone
影响因子:
1.8
作者:
Helmisaari, Helja-Sisko;Siltala, Tapio
通讯作者:
Siltala, Tapio
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
K. Littke;T. Harrington;S. M. Holub;W. Littke;R. Harrison;E. Turnblom
通讯作者:
E. Turnblom
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2004
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
Fen
通讯作者:
Fen
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2006
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
J. H. Miller;H. L. Allen;B. Zutter;S. Zedaker;R. A. Newbold
通讯作者:
R. A. Newbold