Preferences for separating or combining events.
Preferences for separating or combining events.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037//0022-3514.60.1.5
复制
发表时间：
1991
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Patricia W. Linville;G. W. Fischer
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Patricia W. Linville;G. W. Fischer
这项研究调查了人们对时间上分离或组合情感上有影响的事件的偏好。例如，人们是否更喜欢经历两个负面事件（例如，在同一天还是不同的日子？人们是否更喜欢经历两个积极的事件（例如，在同一天或不同的日子里，手稿的接受？本文提出了一种可再生资源模型，它结合了决策模型（前景理论）的要素，以及人们拥有有限但可再生的生理，认知和社会资源来处理情感影响事件的概念。正如预测的那样，学生倾向于将两个积极事件分开（收益-品味假说），将两个消极事件分开（多重损失-避免假说），以及将一个积极事件和一个消极事件联合收割机组合（损失-缓冲假说）。学生表现出相同的偏好事件从学术，金融和社会领域。
This research investigates people's preferences for temporally separating or combining emotionally impactful events. For instance, do people prefer to experience 2 negative events (e.g., manuscript rejections) on the same day or on different days? Do people prefer to experience 2 positive events (e.g., manuscript acceptances) on the same or different days? This article proposes a renewable resources model that combines elements of decision-making models (prospect theory) with the notion that people possess limited but renewable physiological, cognitive, and social resources for dealing with emotionally impactful events. As predicted, Ss preferred to separate 2 positive events (the gain-savoring hypothesis), to separate 2 negative events (the multiple-loss-avoidance hypothesis), and to combine a positive and a negative event (the loss-buffering hypothesis). Ss displayed identical preferences for events from the academic, financial, and social domains.