Evaluation of Participant Comprehension of Information Received in an Exercise and Diet Intervention Trial: The DR's EXTRA Study
Evaluation of Participant Comprehension of Information Received in an Exercise and Diet Intervention Trial: The DR's EXTRA Study
复制标题
DOI:
10.1159/000254484
复制
发表时间:
2010-01-01
期刊:
影响因子:
3.5
通讯作者:
Laitinen, Tomi
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lansimies-Antikainen, Helena;Pietila, Anna-Maija;Laitinen, Tomi
Background: The informed consent process is the legal and ethical cornerstone of health research and is essential to ensure that participants in health research really understand the information they receive. Clinical studies often fail to provide data that clarify how much participants have understood. Objective: To evaluate the comprehension of older volunteer participants in health research. Methods: The subjects are a random population sample of 1,410 men and women aged 57-78 years, who are participating in a 4-year randomized controlled intervention trial on the effects of physical exercise and diet on atherosclerosis, endothelial function and cognition. A questionnaire about informed consent was given to all willing participants (n = 1,324) 3 months after the randomization. In addition, participants' long-term continuation in the intervention trial with relation to understanding was evaluated 2 years after the randomization. Results: The response rate was 91%. The majority of respondents (89%) were satisfied with the intelligibility of received information. In addition, the participants' comprehension of the information received seemed to be adequate in 82% of the whole study population. Compared to back-ground variables, higher education (p < 0.001) and satisfaction with one's own health (p = 0.01) were associated with adequate comprehension of the provided information. Furthermore, participants who felt themselves to be healthy were more likely to continue participating in the intervention after 2 years. Conclusions: The findings of this study indicated sufficient understanding of received information in older research participants. However, our results indicate that special efforts should be made with participants with lower educational levels or subjective feelings of impaired health. This study highlights the need for researchers to critically analyze the quality of information and how it is provided. This is especially important in long-term follow-up studies. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel