The Growth Accounting Analysis for Regional Economies

The Growth Accounting Analysis for Regional Economies
复制标题

区域经济增长核算分析

DOI:
10.2457/srs.28.73
复制
发表时间:
1997
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
J. Asada
J. Asada
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Asada

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文旨在分析1975-1990年间日本区域经济(=47个县)的增长因素。分析结果表明,资本主导型经济增长最多,为24个县。全要素生产率(TFP)主导型为18个地市,首府+全要素生产率主导型为4个地市。劳动主导型只有一种。对此,关于各地州平均的增长因素,资本贡献率为40.7%,劳动贡献率为16.1%,全要素生产率贡献率为43.2%。增长率较高的地区是SIGA(年增长率3.03%)、千叶县(2.91%)、冈山县(2.17%),毕竟17个县都高于所有县的TFP增长率的平均值。另一方面,增长率较低的地区是和歌山(-0.07%)、冲绳(0.51%)、长崎(0.62%),高增长率地区和低增长率地区在TFP增长率上的差异与制造业在各地区经济中的权重密切相关。
The purpose of this paper is to elucidate the growth factor of regional economies (=47 prefectural economies) in Japan between 1975 and 1990.According to the result of the analysis, capital leading type is the most, that is 24 prefectures. TFP (Total Factor Productivity) leading type is 18 prefectures, capital and TFP leading type is 4 prefectures. Labor leading type is only one. In this connection, as for the growth factor in the average of all prefectures, the rate of the capital contribution is 40.7%, and the rate of the labor contribution is 16.1%, and the rate of TFP contribution is 43.2%.Next, I pay attention to the rate of TFP growth in 47 prefectures. The higher rate region is Siga (annual 3.03%), Chiba (2.91%), Okayama (2.17%), after all 17 prefectures are higher than the rate of TFP growth in the average of all prefectures. The other side, the lower rate region is Wakayama (-0.07%), Okinawa (0.51%), Nagasaki (0.62%).The difference between higher rate regions and lower rate regions about the rate of TFP growth is deeply related to the weight of the manufacturing at each regional economies.