The Case for a New Class Map1
The Case for a New Class Map1
复制标题
新类映射的案例1
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2005
影响因子：
4.4
通讯作者：
D. Grusky
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kim A. Weeden;D. Grusky
越来越流行的说法是，社会阶层是纯粹的学术结构，不再提供关于生活方式、态度和其他个人层面结果的太多信息。对这一说法的少数可用测试依赖于对社会阶层的程式化测量，这些测量要么将详细的职业划分为少数几个“大阶层”，要么将其减少为声望、社会经济地位或文化或经济资本的垂直尺度上的分数。我们表明，这些传统的方法低估了生产地点的总体影响，因为它们没有充分利用在详细的职业水平上发展起来的制度化的社会类别。
It is increasingly fashionable to claim that social classes are purely academic constructs that no longer provide much information about lifestyles, attitudes, and other individual‐level outcomes. The few available tests of this claim rely on stylized measures of social class that either group detailed occupations into a small number of “big classes” or reduce them to scores on vertical scales of prestige, socioeconomic status, or cultural or economic capital. We show that these conventional approaches understate the total effects of the site of production by failing to capitalize on the institutionalized social categories that develop at the detailed occupational level.