The joint embedding property and maximal models
The joint embedding property and maximal models
复制标题
联合嵌入属性和最大模型
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2015
影响因子:
0.3
通讯作者:
I. Souldatos
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Baldwin;Martin Koerwien;I. Souldatos
We introduce the notion of a ‘pure’ Abstract Elementary Class to block trivial counterexamples. We study classes of models of bipartite graphs and show: Main Theorem (cf. Theorem 3.34 and Corollary 3.38): If $$langle lambda _i: ile alpha <aleph _1
angle $$⟨λi:i≤α<ℵ1⟩ is a strictly increasing sequence of characterizable cardinals (Definition 2.1) whose models satisfy JEP$$(<lambda _0)$$(<λ0), there is an $$L_{omega _1,omega }$$Lω1,ω-sentence $$psi $$ψ whose models form a pure AEC and(1)The models of $$psi $$ψ satisfy JEP$$(<lambda _0)$$(<λ0), while JEP fails for all larger cardinals and AP fails in all infinite cardinals.(2)There exist $$2^{lambda _i^+}$$2λi+ non-isomorphic maximal models of $$psi $$ψ in $$lambda _i^+$$λi+, for all $$ile alpha $$i≤α, but no maximal models in any other cardinality; and(3)$$psi $$ψ has arbitrarily large models. In particular this shows the Hanf number for JEP and the Hanf number for maximality for pure AEC with Löwenheim number $$aleph _0$$ℵ0 are at least $$eth _{omega _1}$$ℶω1. We show that although $$AP(kappa )$$AP(κ) for each $$kappa $$κ implies the full amalgamation property, $$JEP(kappa )$$JEP(κ) for each $$kappa $$κ does not imply the full joint embedding property. We prove the main combinatorial device of this paper cannot be used to extend the main theorem to a complete sentence.