Robert Grosseteste and the pursuit of Religious and Scientific Learning in the Middle Ages
Robert Grosseteste and the pursuit of Religious and Scientific Learning in the Middle Ages
复制标题
罗伯特·格罗斯泰斯特和中世纪对宗教和科学学习的追求
DOI：
10.1007/978-3-319-33468-4_12
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Gasper G
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gasper G
罗伯特·格罗斯泰斯特（Robert Grosseteste）对六日创造的评论，《六日创造论》（the Hexaemeron），是他最广泛和详细的神学著作之一。在他担任林肯主教期间，它借鉴了早期的讲座，特别是那些关于创世纪的讲座，以及他的科学论文。在hexaemerongrossetest提供了一个强大的定义神学，认为它不应该被确定为一门科学，但在这个定义的过程中部署阿斯特丽德的定义与伟大的技巧。TheHexaemeron显示充分的深度范围Grosseteste的阅读，并提供，在其评论创作，履行他的早期工作，把调查自然现象的服务注释。本文将探讨相关的主题格罗斯泰斯特使用他的早期作品，以及其随后的解释的影响。自然，创造和他们的解释，由人类的原因允许Grosseteste广泛的范围内的评论，所有接地在适当的主题神学，统一的工作基督。
Robert Grosseteste’s commentary on the six days of creation, theHexaemeron, is one of his most extensive and detailed theological works. Composed during his time as bishop of Lincoln, it draws on earlier lectures, notably those on Genesis, and his scientific treatises. In theHexaemeronGrosseteste provides a powerful definition of theology, arguing that it should not be identified as a science, but in the course of this definition deploying Aristotelian definitions with great skill. TheHexaemerondisplays to the full the depth of range of Grosseteste’s reading, and provides, in its commentary on creation, the fulfillment of his earlier work, placing investigation of natural phenomena in the service of exegesis. This paper will explore pertinent themes for Grosseteste’s use of his earlier writing, and the implications of their subsequent interpretation. Nature, Creation and their interpretation by human reason allow Grosseteste wide scope for commentary, all grounded in the proper subject of theology, the unifying work of Christ.