Prosodic boundaries in adjunct attachment
Prosodic boundaries in adjunct attachment
复制标题
DOI：
10.1006/jmla.2000.2762
复制
发表时间：
2001-07-01
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
Frazier, L
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Carlson, K;Clifton, C;Frazier, L
五项研究探讨了处理模棱两可的句子，比如马丁认为首席执行官在调查开始时撒谎。核心问题是为什么特定的韵律边界会产生这样的效果。一份书面问卷提供了基线偏好，并表明小句型的依恋者（调查开始时）比非小句型的依恋者（调查开始时）获得更多的高依恋。四个听觉研究操纵了附加分句前的韵律边界和母体分句与其补语之间的韵律边界。它们否定了只有附加词前的局部边界才重要的说明的每一个版本。该解释是基于边界的声学幅度还是基于其语音类型（以存在短语重音为特征的中间边界与以短语重音和边界音调两者为特征的语调短语边界）。相反，结果支持使用全球韵律背景。特别是局部边界和远边界的相对大小。北京：科学出版社.
Five studies explored the processing of ambiguous sentences like Martin maintained that the CEO lied when the investigation started/at the start of the investigation. The central question was why particular prosodic boundaries have the effects they do. A written questionnaire provided baseline preferences and suggested that clausal adjuncts (when the investigation started) receive more high attachments than nonclausal adjuncts (at the start of the investigation). Four auditory studies manipulated the prosodic boundary before the adjunct clause and the prosodic boundary between the matrix clause and its complement. They disconfirm every version of an account where only the local boundary before the adjunct is important. whether the account is based on the acoustic magnitude of the boundary or its phonological type tan intermediate boundary characterized by the presence of a phrase accent vs. an intonational phrase boundary characterized by both a phrase accent and a boundary tone). Instead the results support use of the global prosodic context. especially the relative size of the local boundary and the distant boundary. 2001 Academic Press.