We're Not Burning Down the House: Synthesizing Pre-Internet, Current Findings, and Future Research on Social Cognition and Being Online
We're Not Burning Down the House: Synthesizing Pre-Internet, Current Findings, and Future Research on Social Cognition and Being Online
复制标题
我们不会烧毁房子：综合互联网出现之前、当前的发现以及关于社会认知和在线的未来研究
DOI：
10.1080/1047840x.2013.850765
复制
发表时间：
2013
影响因子：
9.3
通讯作者：
Ljubica Chatman
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
B. Sparrow;Ljubica Chatman
很高兴在撰写我们的目标文章和阅读其精彩评论的同时，撰写并了解有关人类认知交叉点已经完成和应该完成的所有引人入胜的工作。我们感谢对我们的目标文章提交评论的作者，从而为本期《心理探究》的广度和深度做出了贡献：评论员作为一个群体为我们自己的评论提供了细微差别（例如，记忆和交流/社会互动），讨论了我们没有考虑的方面（例如，体现和个体差异的检查），有时分享他们的最新研究成果。很明显，我们都相信这是一个值得研究的有趣话题，我们不认为，作为一个群体，我们需要烧毁互联网来拯救物种。当然，在网上生活也有消极的一面，就像人们选择做的任何事情都有消极的一面一样。人们一致认为，互联网不会消失（我们中的几个人使用了这个短语），并且有很多方法来研究人类如何适应生活在一个不同的信息环境中，因为它被无处不在的互联网连接所改变。随着互联网的使用扩展到越来越多的生活领域，研究其影响的方法必然会变得更加多样化和众多。虽然我们确实相信社会认知应该果断地参与这个重要的问题，但许多其他科学学科也会对这个主题感兴趣。把“互联网”作为一个单一的概念来研究似乎是不明智的。它对人类行为产生影响，因为它使多种行为广泛而普遍存在。这些行为，如互联网搜索和聊天，可能会给特定的基本认知过程带来重大变化。为了负责任地研究互联网如何影响我们的认知功能，重要的是要定义互联网使用的动机，以及在具体化，个人感知和沟通方面的心理相关差异。
It was a pleasure to write and learn about all the fascinating work that has been done and should be done regarding the intersection of human cognition, both while writing our target article and reading the wonderful commentaries to it. We are indebted to the authors who submitted their commentary to our target article, thus contributing to the breadth and depth of this issue of Psychological Inquiry: The commentators as a group provided nuances to our own review (e.g., memory and communication/social interaction), discussed aspects we did not consider (e.g., embodiment and an examination of individual differences), sometimes sharing their newest research findings. It’s abundantly clear that we all believe this is an interesting topic worthy of research and that we don’t, as group, believe the Internet is something we need to burn down to save the species. There are, of course, negative aspects to living our lives online just as there are negative aspects to pretty much anything people choose to do with their lives. What is agreed is that the Internet is not going away (several of us used that very phrase) and that there are many ways to approach the study of how humans adapt to living in a different informational environment as it is transformed by the ubiquitous presence and affordances of Internet connectivity. As the use of the Internet expands into more and more areas of life, the approaches to studying its influence are bound to become more diverse and numerous. Although we do believe social cognition should decidedly engage with this important question, many other scientific disciplines will find interest in this topic as well. It seems ill advised to study “the Internet” as a unitary concept. It has an impact on human behavior because of the broad array and ubiquitous presence of a multiplicity of behaviors that it enables. These behaviors, such as Internet searches and chatting, may then introduce significant changes to specific basic cognitive processes. To responsibly study how the Internet might affect our cognitive functioning, it’s important to define the motivations for Internet use, as well as psychologically relevant differences in embodiment, person perception and communication.
外部机构的幻觉。
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Gilbert,DT;Brown,RP;Pinel,EC;Wilson,TD
通讯作者：
Wilson,TD