When two worlds collide: critical reflection on co-production
When two worlds collide: critical reflection on co-production
复制标题
DOI：
10.1108/dat-08-2017-0040
复制
发表时间：
2018-01-01
影响因子：
0.9
通讯作者：
Cox, Nigel
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Clayson, Amanda;Webb, Lucy;Cox, Nigel
目的本研究的目的是通过反身性数据收集，对社区和学术界两个世界：有生活经验的人和他们的社区中间人和学术研究人员之间不断演变的联合生产研究关系进行研究。它报告了对不同合作伙伴在物质使用回收联合生产研究的背景下探索和评估自己的联合生产研究经验的反思分析。设计/方法/方法该研究使用了来自中介社区合作伙伴、学术合作伙伴和社区研究人员关于一系列联合生产研究项目经验的反身性数据。其目的是从不同的立场和通过适应联合生产关系的过程来确定联合生产经验的主题特征。本文概述了从联合生产经验中学到的东西，以及对社区和学术合作伙伴有用的东西；围绕联合生产的性质、绩效障碍及其对参与者和更广泛的恢复研究议程的价值。原创/价值本文报告了关于卫生和社会护理发展方法论的独特视角，有助于增加关于联合生产研究经验的知识体系。
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to report the findings from reflexive data collection on the evolving co-production research relationship between the two worlds of community and academia: people with lived experience and their community intermediaries and academic researchers. It reports analysis of reflections on experience as the different partners explore and evaluate their own experiences of co-productive research within the context of substance use recovery co-production research.Design/methodology/approach The research uses reflexive data from perspectives of an intermediary community partner, academic partners, and community researchers on experiences of a series of co-productive research projects. The aim is to identify thematic features of the co-productive experiences from different positions and through the process of adaptation to a co-productive relationship.Findings This paper outlines what has been learnt from the experience of co-production and what has worked for community and academic partners; around the nature of co-production, barriers to performance, and its value to participants and the wider recovery research agenda.Originality/value This paper reports a unique perspective on a developing methodology in health and social care, contributing to a growing body of knowledge pertaining to experiences of co-production research.