Examining the policy needs for implementing nature-based solutions in cities: Findings from city-wide transdisciplinary experiences in Glasgow (UK), Genk (Belgium) and Poznan (Poland)
Examining the policy needs for implementing nature-based solutions in cities: Findings from city-wide transdisciplinary experiences in Glasgow (UK), Genk (Belgium) and Poznan (Poland)
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104688
复制
发表时间：
2020-07-01
期刊：
影响因子：
7.1
通讯作者：
Lodder, Marleen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Frantzeskaki, Niki;Vandergert, Paula;Lodder, Marleen
为了推进在城市中实施基于自然的解决方案的科学和实践，必须审查障碍并提供克服障碍的方法。本文提出了一个政策需求的概念框架，用于分析基于自然的解决方案的实施科学，并将其与实施实践联系起来，通过将研究充分的差距与更具创新性的以行动为导向的政策制定方法联系起来，推动文献的发展，我们认为这是嵌入扩大基于自然的解决方案所必需的。我们概念化和接地的技能，知识和合作伙伴关系的政策需求框架理论在国家统计局的政策和规划，并在三个欧洲案例研究城市：比利时的根克，英国的格拉斯哥和波兰的波兹南的经验文献。交叉案例研究分析指出，系统思维和解决方案导向思维的知识需求对于实施基于自然的解决方案至关重要。我们的分析进一步指出，技能的谈判和合作的需要，行政筒仓桥接和建立多部门的伙伴关系，规划和共同管理国家统计局至关重要。最后，我们总结了三种解决实施政策需求的方法：首先，城市可以投资于量身定制和有针对性的能力建设计划，第二，需要建立机构空间，允许通过合作伙伴关系进行协作学习，第三，城市需要制定治理创新，促进基于自然的解决方案的设计和实施的循证政策。
To advance the science and practice of implementing nature-based solutions in cities, it is important to examine the obstacles and provide means to overcome them. This paper presents a conceptual framework of policy needs for analysing the science of nature-based solutions' implementation and connect it to the practice of their implementation that advances the literature by connecting well-researched gaps to a more innovative action-oriented policy development approach that we argue is required for embedding scaled-up nature-based solutions. We conceptualise and ground the policy needs framework of skills, knowledge and partnerships theoretically in current literature of NBS policy and planning and empirically in three European case study cities: Genk in Belgium, Glasgow in UK and Poznan in Poland. The cross-case study analysis points to the knowledge needs of systems' thinking and solutions-oriented thinking as paramount for implementing nature-based solutions. Our analysis further points to the skills' needs of negotiation and collaboration for administrative silo bridging and for forging multi-sectoral partnerships essential for planning, and co-managing NBS. We conclude with three ways forward to addressing the policy needs for implementation: first, cities can invest in tailored and targeted capacity building programs, second, institutional spaces need to be established that allow for collaborative learning through and for partnerships and third, cities need to chart governance innovations that promote evidence-based policy for nature-based solutions' design and implementation.