Yes, but … We need reliability to advance infant work, but there's more to consider too: Important nuances of reliability and the need to include validity.
Yes, but … We need reliability to advance infant work, but there's more to consider too: Important nuances of reliability and the need to include validity.
复制标题
是的，但是……我们需要可靠性来推进婴儿工作，但还有更多需要考虑：可靠性的重要细微差别以及包括有效性的必要性。
DOI：
10.1002/icd.2325
复制
发表时间：
2022
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
Chmielewski,Michael
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kucker,SarahC;Chmielewski,Michael
发展领域需要更可靠的婴儿工作-改进我们的措施和方法是准确理解儿童为什么做他们所做的事情的核心！然而，作为科学家，我们不能止步于可靠性，还必须在我们的研究中包括有效性措施。在这篇评论中，我们澄清和扩展的可靠性和测量误差的讨论。我们还认为，必须评估我们的措施和任务的有效性。事实上，认真考虑信度和效度对于改善婴儿研究是必要的。HighlightsImproving the reliability of infant work is critical;然而，可靠性本身并不足以推动科学的发展。捕获多种类型的信度和效度指标将为研究者带来最佳的测量和工具。
The field of development needs more reliable infant work – improving our measures and methods is at the heart of accurately understanding why children do what they do! However, as scientists, we cannot stop with reliability but must also include measures of validity in our studies. In this commentary, we clarify and expand upon discussions of reliability and measurement error. We also argue for the importance of assessing the validity of our measures and tasks. Indeed, careful considerations of both reliability and validity are necessary for improving infant research.HighlightsImproving the reliability of infant work is critical; however, reliability by itself is not sufficient for advancing science.Capturing multiple types of reliability and indices of validity will lead to the best measures and tools for researchers.A careful consideration of both reliability and validity are necessary for improving infant research.