INTEGRATION VERSUS DIFFERENTIATION OF FLUID-CRYSTALLIZED INTELLIGENCE IN OLD-AGE
INTEGRATION VERSUS DIFFERENTIATION OF FLUID-CRYSTALLIZED INTELLIGENCE IN OLD-AGE
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0012-1649.16.6.625
复制
发表时间：
1980-01-01
影响因子：
4
通讯作者：
WILLIS, SL
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
BALTES, PB;CORNELIUS, SW;WILLIS, SL
几种心理测量智力模型，主要沿着分化-整合的发展连续体对老年人进行了评估。109名老年人（年龄范围60-89岁）进行了17项能力测试，以标记卡特尔和霍恩流体（Gf）、结晶智力（Gc）和速度维度。以智力和中间结果Gf/Gc模型为指导，采用验证性因子分析对7 ~ 1个因子的结构模型进行评价。主要有三个发现。因子较少的模型能更好地拟合数据。基于经验和理论标准，具有一般因子和3组因子的模型尤其可接受。对于年龄较大的受试者，不可能获得一个可接受的解决方案，该解决方案将直接与年轻年龄组报告的第一层因素的Gf/Gc结构模式平行。这些发现支持了老年心理智力的新整合或去分化观点。
Several models of psychometric intelligence, differing primarily along the developmental continuum of differentiation-integration for older adults were evaluated. A sample of 109 elderly adults (age range, 60-89) was administered a battery of 17 ability tests selected to mark Cattell''s and Horn''s fluid (Gf) and crystallized intelligence (Gc) and speed dimensions. Using the Gf/Gc model of intelligence and intermediate outcomes as guidelines, structural models with between 7 and 1 factors were successively evaluated by confirmatory factor analysis. Three main findings emerged. Models with fewer factors provided better fits to the data. A model with a general factor and 3 group factors was especially acceptable, based on empirical and theoretical criteria. It was not possible to obtain an acceptable solution for older subjects that would directly parallel the Gf/Gc structural pattern of 1st-stratum factors reported for younger age groups. The findings support a neointegration or dedifferentiation view of psychometric intelligence in old age.